Essay On Our Founding Fathers

People will be able to vote freely and focus on those who are the most widely known citizens. Therefore it seems as though a republic is more capable of controlling the effects of

The United States has a government of laws, not of men. While individuals are in charge of the United States Government, the Constitution is the dogma guiding the decision-making of those in power. After the American colonies declared independence from Great Britain, the collective colonies constructed their first written constitution: The Articles of Confederation. A decade later, the colonies saw the shortfalls of the Articles of Confederation, and came together at the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Like in contemporary politics, two factions controlled the Convention of 1787: the Federalists and Antifederalists.

Despite its name, the Roman Republic was actually quite a mix of both a republic and a democracy. This is said because they used a bottom-up system, allowing even the people with little roles to vote, such as The Assembly. They would vote for their leaders and laws, among other things, as well. One of the main factors in having a republic government is to not have the people involved in selecting leaders, but the Roman Republic did just that. A person cannot say that a republic is a republic if they allow the people to vote because having the people vote is a major part of democracy.

In 1776, our union is finally independent from Great Britain. Now that our country is an independent nation, our founding fathers are deciding which government system it is going to rule under. Certainly, our founding fathers did not want this country to be rule under a monarchy system because of the conflicts they faced with Great Britain. The founding fathers all sat together at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia to create a new kind of government that will have a minimal amount of problems. At first, the founding father created the Articles of Confederation, which is, each state maintains its own sovereignty and all rights to govern, except there were certain rights that were granted to Congress.

A large republic government prevails over small republic or democracy when controlling factions because there are more people to divide into the factions and therefore there is less unification among the members of the factions. Also, if there is a large republic in which Senators are elected, it is easier to hold the leaders accountable for their actions due to the amount of people because the leaders need to stay on good terms in order to continue receiving votes. In contrast, a small republic allows the citizens to be easily manipulated by factions and leaders. A large republic protects the minority because factions will exist for as long as there is freedom.

#10,1788) 1. In this type of government, a community could have a meeting and completely enact or defeat legislation through the votes in an election. Madison refers to a republic as “a republic, by which I mean a government in which the scheme of representation takes place.” So, in simpler terms we could say that a democracy makes decisions together as a community on a smaller scale through a vote in comparison to a Republic where “representation” would be provided and citizens choose leaders to make decisions for them (Jeffersonian Perspective)3.

This is significant due to the Constitution being designed to protect the individual rights of citizens and it keeps the government accountable to the people. One of the main ideas of the Constitution is popular sovereignty, which basically means that people are the ultimate authority in the United States. We the people of the United state elect officials to represent us. This gives the people power over the government as we control who controls us. The government’s power is also divided through the separation of power.

Why did the founding fathers decide to establish a democratic republic? Did they have anything to benefit from said democracy, or were they actually morally compelled to create a more perfect union to serve and protect all of the citizens of the united states? Although many of the founding fathers have left diaries, articles, and speeches behind for us to dissect and analyze, I believe that there is no better way to learn about a man 's character other than by observing his behavior first hand, and personally questioning him. That is why instead of going to see the Salem witch trials, being at Lincoln 's Gettysburg Address, or even watching the battle Saratoga, I would rather sit in and experience the four long months of debate and argument

At the point when our founding fathers were establishing our nation, they imagined a decentralized government that ensured our God-given rights and was established on the rule of self-administration. They took a chance with their lives, fortunes and respect to make the best country the world has ever known in view of restricted government association in the regular day to day existences of Americans. They were likewise tired of incorporated power, making the tenth Amendment to control the central government's voracious want to extend and develop. They wanted people to have a say in the government and that the government only derives its legitimate power from the consent of the governed. Even though our founding fathers could establish a good

Founding Fathers live exactly like us. They could be respected from getting the U.S. started, but they are still normal people, with every too-human quirk and relative problems. Thomas Jefferson was too worried to discuss with a crush. John Adams disliked the post-independence business. George Washington got really angry While they were not related to another world, the Founding Fathers were amazigly trained and talented.

INTRO: So, what is a republic? A republic is a democratic nation in which the highest public office is held not by a monarch, who inherits the position by birth, but instead by a citizen chosen on merit. Australia is a monarchy because it was colonised by the British in 1788. With them, they brought their lifestyles, culture and system of government.

Moreover, the scheme of representation and the various mechanisms for selecting representatives established by the Constitution were clearly intended to produce a republic, not a democracy (This Nation). In conclusion the United States is not a democracy. It is not a democracy because of how our government is set up with rule by law. The United States are mostly a republic more than a democracy for many reasons.

Another example of the negativity of having an excess of democracy could be seen is with Shay’s Rebellion which showed one of the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. With a direct democracy it is run by the people and every decision is made by the people. With this no state was willing to raise an army to put down Shay’s rebellion. On the other hand with a republic the states have to follow the rules stated within the Constitution. A Republic offered something that was able to limit the strength on the central government which was checks and balances within the three branches of the government, which ensured that one branch doesn’t get to strong.

The thing that is different about representative democracy and monarchy that the people for representative democracy can vote out their representatives. In addition absolute monarchy is where they are limitless .The king represents their country. They are alike because they both use a king or queen.

First of all, it is important to know the definition of democracy and its aspects. According to Peter Joyce (2005), the democratic government was initiated in the Greek city state of Athens in the fifth century B.C., so as a consequence, the word ‘democracy’ derived from two Greek words, demos (meaning ‘people’) and kratos (meaning ‘power’) , which means ‘government by the people’. Secondly, Giovanni Sartori (1997), a Political Science Researcher states that ‘democracy’ is an abbreviation that means Liberal Democracy. He distinguishes three aspects: democracy as a principle of legitimacy (power not derives