Essay On Nevada Government

The Constitution DBQ The Constitution of United States is regarded by many as an important document, for it gave the common people the power to form a government the way they want. Yet, despite all the benefits that it brought to the American people at the time, people also had some concerns about the Constitution such as: it is creating a Central government that is too powerful, only white men that owns property are allowed to vote, not everyone in the nation are treated equally, etc. When the Constitution was first being drafted, Representatives from each state hoped to add terms that would benefit their own states—this lead to a heated debate on how the Constitution should be formed.

Because of its many complexity’s, the Nevada state legislature has various strengths and weaknesses and some components are both. For example, the 120-day session restriction. The restriction saves the state money, because the longer a session runs the costlier it becomes, even though the state only pays a salary for the first 60 days, they still pay expenses for the second 60. However, this session restriction also forces the legislator to do a lot in a relatively short time. Which can lead to questionable decision making, such as when the time the senate passed 9 bills in seven minutes (pg. 72). Another weakness of the legislature, is the decision to have biennale sessions rather than annual sessions, which has created problems for the

The Nevada Constitution was approved in September 1864 (“The Constitution of the State of Nevada”). Nevada’s constitution “very much reveals the... context of the time, in its provisions” (“Nevada Constitution Lecture” 0:05:06-0:05:14). As this document was created during the Civil War, “no event affected the Nevada Constitution’s tone and content more that the Civil War” (“The Civil War and Nevada” 94). Some of this content focused on the Civil War strengthened the document, but some weakened it.

Question 5 The primary differences between the California State Constitution of 1849 and 1879 was that the first constitution supported a limited government that protected the people’s right and their common wealth. The second constitution contained social class struggles, anti-immigration laws and encouraged the development of the constitution we have today. California constitution was initially developed because the governor at the time wanted California to be a state. After the Gold Rush California was seen as a rich land and very capable of being its own states.

Massachusetts and Nevada are different in many ways when it comes to their government. From the number of terms one is able to serve in a certain position to the qualifications to become a voter both states have their own way of running themselves. It’s interesting to see how states governments can vary when it comes to local government and political parties and support programs for their residents. In Nevada, the Governor of the State of Nevada is the highest state office.

Yet an amendment must be recommended by Congress and have a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures. Afterwards, Congress will recommend the amendment in the form of a joint resolution and a notification is sent to the Governors of each state. As a result the recommended amendment only becomes a part of the constitution only if it is ratified by 38 of 50 states. A great example of the amendment process is the 27th amendment. Originally submitted to congress on September 25, 1789, the congressional apportionment amendment didn’t get ratified because there weren’t enough states for the amendment to become a part of the constitution.

There are several differences in the states of Utah and Nevada with one of them being having different lifestyles. Utah has the healthiest individuals in the United States. The state is inhabited by Mormons and they are a strong influence to the state. The state of Utah is a more restricted society as well. Mormons live quiet lives and the consumption of tobacco and alcohol is non-existent.

The United States constitution and the North Carolina constitution were both created to initiate a form a government at their own levels, and to give those governments specific powers. Both constitutions have similar outlines of their executive, legislative, and judicial branches, and include an article that secures the rights of citizens through the legal systems. Although they bear conspicuous similarities, such as structure, the state and U.S. constitutions do exhibit differences as well. Possibly the most recognizable distinction between the two constitutions is that the North Carolina constitution has a basis of religion. The preamble states that the people of North Carolina are “grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations”.

" The Federal version has been amended but never replaced - though in 1861, there was an attempt to withdraw completely from the union, and 11 southern states lived under an alternative Confederate constitution for about 4 years. Unlike the US Constitution written in 1787, Virginia 's 1776 document made no provision for any amendments. Pressure for changes resulted in a constitutional convention in 1829 that wrote a new constitution, replacing rather than amending the one adopted in 1776. The 1830 constitution also provided for no amendment process, so another convention held in 1850 wrote Virginia 's third

AS 901526752 Evan Atkisson Texas Government 2306-071 Municipal Government in Texas The role of a mayor in Texas government is critical as they serve as the chief executive officer of a city. The mayor is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the city and oversees all municipal related services - including public safety, sanitation, and transportation. The mayor also serves as the spokesperson for the city and represents the city in local, state, and national limelight. One of the primary responsibilities of a mayor in Texas government is to develop and implement policies that promote economic growth and development within the city. The mayor works closely with city council members and other officials to create initiatives that attract

There are many Constitutions in the U.S., all the state constitutions and the U.S. Constitution. I will be writing about both the Maryland and U.S. Constitution, which have many differences and similarities. This essay is about the three similarities and differences of the Maryland and U.S. Constitution that I found. The three differences and similarities are the state constitution is reserved for state government, whereas the U.S. Constitution is reserved for the national government, “They both embody the principles of representative democratic government”, and they are different in length and structure.

Texas is the second most populated and second largest state in United State. Due to its size, Texas contains diverse landscapes that resemble both American South and Southwest. Most of the population centers are located in areas of formers prairies, grass lands, forests, and the coastline. The current Texas Constitution was adopted in 1876. Like most of the states, it also provides for a separation off power.

In order to ratify, three-fourths of all state legislatures must ratify or three-fourths must approve via Ratifying Conventions. Initiative and referendum are powers granted to the electorate by the constitution of several states and refer to the processes that allow voters to vote directly on certain legislation. They represent direct check on democracy as people can exercise their powers to accept or reject a piece of legislation. Texas does not provide for this, however, states such Arizona has initiated statues and amendments and New Mexico has referendum only. The current Texas Constitution is ridiculed by scholars as being a burden by excessive detail, outdated and contradictory provisions as well as too hard to amend and it is too unclear in outlining the separation of powers which exists in Texas.

State constitutions grant powers that are no limited where the U.S. constitution’s main purpose was to limit powers. State constitutions often have longer documents, as said above; the U.S. constitution is a basic outline, where the state constitution has a more specific outline that acquires more documentation. The U.S. constitution has changed only 27 times over the past two centuries, where the state constitution has room for improvement and is always changing. The U.S. has a representative democracy system that rejects direct democracy as a form of government. The states however believed that those types of constitutional arrangements were simply obsolete and wanted to give the chance for citizens to have a chance to participate in the creating of laws.

These authorities that the national government should have, were all up to the states to decide under the Articles. With the taking away some of the states rights in the Constitution, Anti-federalists feared that this would leave the states too weak, resulting in more problems. Under the new Constitution, many powers that were now in the government 's hands are: the power to levy and collect taxes, the power to regulate interstate commerce, the government set up a national court system consisting of district, circuit, and a supreme court, the government could enforce laws, there was now a house based on population, and a senate based on equal representation (two votes per state), to amend the Constitution, a ⅔ vote of Congress was needed, and a ¾ vote of the states were needed, and a majority rule was needed to pass bills. These new powers and abilities of the national government helped to create a strong, new