Dog Ban Only Solution To Attacks: Article Analysis

The New York Times wrote an article called “A Breed That Came up the Hard Way” were it stated that because of their unparalleled love and devotion for children they were commonly known as “The Nanny Dog” throughout the late 19th and early centuries. (Fletcher,W 1971). Meanwhile advocates for this breed claim this specific breed is the most abused, tortured and abandoned breed in the U.S. They’re often difficult to adopt out due to their stigma caused by the media. The ASPCA revealed that there is no evidence that shows how breed-specific laws make communities safer for people or companion animals, these laws are costly and extremely difficult to enforce.

Every few years it happens, the headlines read “Child bitten” or “Veterinarian receives stitches after severe bite from vicious Pitbull.” As humans, we are naturally drawn and alarmed by headlines that induce our fear and panic. But are these stories always true or does the media have double standards. The time has come to sort out fact from fiction and realize that outlawing pit bulls will not make the world a safer place, it will only succeed in tearing beloved pets from their families.

The cities provide us with parks and they rely on the people to respect and follow the rules in place. often the rules are heeded and there could be a lawsuit waiting to happen because if an encounter were to occur whether its dog vs dog or dog vs victim its rightful for the individual to sue not only the attackers owner but the city as well for not enforcing the law. although this could be factual its also possible that there wouldnt be any attacks and that the dogs could actually get along if provided the space to socialise,exersize and hang out. The issue of dogs noise levels that prevents residents from sleeping as it says in the opposing passage can easily be addressed by setting an appropriate time frame and having the park closed at a reasonable hour. The opposing passage stated that the park is too expensive and that the fence alone is 70,000 dollars and that dog owners shouldnt pressure the city to provide the space they cannot provide themselves.

Pit bulls are the first dogs to blame when there is an attack, even though it would be proven to be a different breed. The breed specific legislation

To build his credibility the author uses evidence such as; “The French, who love their dogs, sometimes eat their horses. The Spanish, who love their horses, sometimes eat their cows. The Indians, who love their cows, sometimes eat their dogs” (Foer, par 3). This piece of evidence starts by showing the authors credibility because it proves that he has studied other cultures and their everyday lives as well as their own animal taboos. Another piece of evidence that presents the author with credibility is when he mentions, “Perhaps we could include dogs under the Human Methods of Slaughter Act” (Foer, Par. 12).

I believe that there is a cultural assumption that everyone loves dogs because it’s the norm. Also, those who dislike dogs typically don’t approach the owner, as those who enjoy the presence of dogs, approach the owner, so the owner ends up getting only positive reactions and no negative ones. He includes this statistic to prove that people are oblivious to the fact that dogs can be dangerous animals.

In her work “What’s Wrong with Animal Rights,” Vicki Hearne challenges common beliefs of animal rights, arguing that animal rights groups do very little to actually benefit animals. She argues that natural selection should be allowed to take place for wild animals, and animals such as cats and dogs should not be seen as property. To persuade the audience to support her position, she uses ethos, pathos, and logos. Her credibility as a trainer makes the logic behind her views reliable, her logic reinforces the examples she uses, and she appeals to emotion using her relationship with her Airedale, Drummer, to support everything her argument is saying. Through these strategies, Vicki Hearne effectively counters the current, popular views of the

Consequently, there are proven facts and instances where BSL has actually not done anything at all but kill and outlaw a breed of dog. I honestly think that it is amazing that BSL is still even an option to obtaining stronger public safety, mainly because of

Although some people might give facts like how pit bulls caused 68% of dog attacks since 1982. On the other hand dog bite reports do not show accurate statistics due to the fact that if they did chihuahuas would rank the most aggressive dog causing almost all dog bites. on an earth.com cite states a report by the Task Force on Canine Aggression and Human-Canine Interactions states, “Dog bite statistics are not really statistics, and they do not give an accurate picture of dogs that bite”. dog bite statistics are not trustworthy because if they were, chihuahuas would cause almost all of the dog bites. The reason dog bite statistics are not accurate is that people only reported dog bites that inflict enough damage.

“In Calgary, Alberta, Canada,they wrote a community policing policy that focuses on aggression of dogs rather than the breed of dogs. ”Best Friends Animal Society explained three are mitigating factors in dog attacks, 97% of the owners had not sterilized the dogs, 84% of the owners had abused or neglected their dogs, and caused dog bites, and 78% were using the dogs as protective dogs for farms, or himself instead of keeping the dogs as home held pets.” With the safety of the US I think we should focus on bigger causes like maybe helping the homeless, instead of worrying about mistreated dogs. I can think of many problems in the Us, instead of pitbulls, like the constant rise of inflation, and other things that are hurting the US. What might happen to

There is a long list of regulations that need to be meet to obtain a dog such as liability insurance mandatory spay or neuter and muzzled in public. With BSL the government basically controls who can and cannot have a banned

Do you have a love of dogs? If so, then you will be very interested in this essay. I have conducted some research and even though I am not a dog lover I do not feel that all the pit bulls in Texas should be banned. The pit bulls only know what their owners teach them. Texas pit bull owners need to teach them to be good.

Have you ever been bit by a dog and thought it was mean? Come to find out, it is very possible it’s not mean at all. Many facts show that dogs bite in many different scenarios. It’s not that they are mean, it could be how they were raised, them feeling threatened, or even low tolerance. There are many statements that prove that the dogs should not be executed for biting someone when it could possibly be our fault as a owner.

They push the argument that not all people are fans of dogs, and that they wouldn't feal comfortable around them. They also bring up the issue of not knowing the temperments of all dogs, so they wouldn't know whether a dog would behave in the workplace or not. A statment of a local employee in a survey about this subject said, "Even pets that are well-behaved at home may act unpredictably in a new enviroment or around unfamiliar people." (Against Bringing Dogs to Work)

The preceding paragraphs explored evidence to demonstrate it from three different aspects: eating dog meat is something normal in China, it is beneficial to people’s bodies and that eating dog meat doesn’t infringe upon the legitimate rights of others. But it’s a distinct condition of stealing and eating dogs which belong to others, and one will be chargeable with theft if they do this.. As a saying goes “Nothing can be accomplished without norms or standards.” Government must increase the intensity of punishment for stealing and eating domesticated dogs to protect the rights of the dogs’