Did Sherlock Holmes Make The Right Decisions?

Another piece of evidence that we have gathered was that the hotel room was over checked. If the maid had decided to go ahead and steal the necklace, she would of have a better idea of where the necklace was, and most likely would of cleaned up all of the evidence.

Last night, on September 12th, by 1337 Elington drive, Ms.Adela Strangeworth’s roses were supposedly vandalized by an unknown towns person. There has been speculation as to why a towns person vandalized Ms.Adela Strangeworth’s roses. Townspeople have recently called out Ms. Strangeworth for harassment in the form of letters that she sent them anonymously, and townsperson angered by Ms.Strangeworth’s letters most likely ruined her flowers. The roses were allegedly cut down with a knife or a similar sharp object and damaged by a lot of force. A few hours after Ms.Adela Strangeworth reported the incident, most townspeople were aloof about the matter, while others were sympathetic.

The victim Stephanie Chase is the mother of Kayleigh. Kayleigh was unaware that defendant Pridgen took the jewelry. After the defendant Pridgen did actually and intentionally deprive

Mary Surratt should not have executed. Mary Surratt was not a good woman, but she did not deserve to be executed by the government. It was possible that Mary Surratt knew about the kidnapping, but she should have never been executed by government on the spot. In source one it states “ At her trial, Surratt was defened by several priests and friends the New York times called “ constant and faithful.” Several priests and friends would have never defend her if they thought she was guilty.

Mrs. Horatio Van Bliven has staged the theft of her own necklace. Mrs. Van Bliven 's $25,000 necklace was stolen from her hotel room. The room 's window had been smashed and the room torn apart. Mrs. Van Bliven wanted to make it look like someone broke in and stole her necklace. What actually happened was that Mrs. Van Bliven made it look like the room had been broken into.

I have chosen to grant Mr. Nelson release due to the strong arguments made by the defense and weak arguments put forth by the crown. First, as seen in both the case description as well as restated by both defense attorneys, Mr. Nelson “has no prior criminal record” (Jack B.), therefore, giving proof to how Mr. Nelson “has no intention of endangering the public in any capacity” (Jacob A.), as well as rebutting doubt against Mr. Nelson not appearing in court with a summons. These arguments support the base outlines for bail release: to ensure public safety, eliminate public fear, and to diminish possible doubts of flight risk/not appearing in court. Second, the defense makes the argument where despite Mr. Nelson being charged with conspiracy to commit murder, “while police did search his home, no illicit drugs

One can see, that this case was very unusual and not an ordinary case, resulting in a delay in the case. One of the prosecutor’s, Brauchler, was for the death penalty and publicly wrote about it an Op-Ed in the Denver Post. Holmes was not mentioned, but he “wrote of capital punishment as an important tool of justice” (NBC- Justice is Death). “Repealing the death penalty would result in acts similar to those in Newtown, Connecticut, or the acts of Tim McVeigh being punished no differently than a single murder of one gang member by another,” the prosecutor wrote (The Denver

No one should be placed in jail without any knowledge or proof of their crime. Citizens of the world are freely walking around, minding their own business. However, what happens when all of a sudden they’re arrested, or they receive a phone call saying that one of their family members is in jail? They would all be confused as to why this occurred.

Not all serial killers are bad people. Studies have shown that cases that some serial killers are just mentally unstable. Instead of putting most serial killers locked away behind bars, they should be sent to a mental institution. It has been shown that some people who has been convicted of being a serial killers has been put into a mental institution and the mind of that person was rehabilitated and better. Instead of just locking them away in a cell, they should get the help they need.

A breach of the conditions set during the release of an arrestee

wait you forgot to take the ring off!!¨ ¨ Oh my!¨ (102 Nic Stone) But in one weird way, she gets to steal a pair of earrings Even if G´ma said that this was all in the past with her and nobody knew about this over time it came out and people now know about it. She went to the jewelry store. It shows that this was not her first time stealing

From utilitarian point of view, the police took a morally right decision as it will on a long term maximize happiness of the community. Utilitarians think that a murderer should not be punished for the purposes of justice or retribution, but rather for the protection of public (Class Notes). An act-utilitarian would support the police’s decision as they maximized happiness for the greatest number of people. The police did not have enough evidence to incriminate Paul Bernardo, thus he was free and could have committed further crimes. However, with Karla’s testimony against him, the police ensured that Paul was behind bars and thus maximized happiness and safety for the entire community.

I believe that if this was tried again that David Goodreau would still be found guilty. Only because when he confessed he knew certain things about the crime that ordinary people wouldn't known. There were defiantly problems with the investigation, Starting with the fact that the police didn't even peruse the murders of the two girls. Another problem with the investigation was that the police never really looked or found any evidence at the crime scenes. David Goodreau was sentenced to life in prison with out parole.

They ask her questions. The detective have asked Mary if they can look around for the murder weapon. When they have searched the entire house they came back and Mary asks them for a drink. They all sip a bit of whiskey. One of the sheriff 's (Jack), tells Mary her oven is on with the lamb (the murder weapon) inside.

Is Sherlock Holmes doing what's best for the people of London or is he above the law in his own way? Throughout the stories and tales of Sherlock Holmes, the constant recurrence of catching the villain and solving the case is apparent throughout Holmes’s legend, but is he really doing anything to save the people of his city and stopping crime? Holmes’s mythos always starts with a crime seen through Dr. Watson’s eye, and we see the conclusion of the case through however the crime is never stopped before hand. Within the book, The Improbable Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, The detective always uses the crime as a starting point to the mystery however he never prevents a life to be lost before the crime is committed.