DBQ 21: Causes of World War II Essay In 1939, the world’s greatest and most powerful nations were launched into World War II, also known as the worst war in modern history. The Second Great War included the central powers and the allied powers. The central powers, which included the countries of Germany, Italy, and Japan, committed belligerent and combative actions which opposed the League of Nations and democratic countries. In opposition to the central powers, the allied powers included the countries of Great Britain, France, the Soviet Union and the United States during the war. The world was plunged into World War II in 1939 due to the ineffective response towards aggression. One act of aggression that was considerably significant was …show more content…
For example, Adolph Hitler had an extreme determination to create the perfect Aryan society, and then to conquer other countries. He had an extreme desire to continue to expand until Germany was the ultimate world power. Hitler stated in his novel Mein Kampf, “Never will the German nation have the moral right to enter into colonial politics until, at least, it includes its own sons within a single state” (Document 1). This quotation reveals Hitler’s charismatic quality, with him stating that unity is essential so Germany will have the power to dominate and take control of other countries. Hitler’s desire to conquer contributed to the start of World War II because many democratic countries, such as Great Britain and France, appeased Germany and pacified Hitler’s demands. In addition to this, Italy attacked Ethiopia in 1935. Emperor Haile Selassie asked the League of Nation (including the British Empire, France, and the Soviet Union) for assistance in ending the invasion. The League of Nations response was ineffective, and Haile Selassie responded by stating, “God and history will remember your judgement… It is us today. It will be you tomorrow (Document 2). This quotation also shows how although the League of Nations was formed post World War I to support defenseless countries and help prevent war, the organization ended up doing the complete opposite in order to appease …show more content…
Chamberlain suggested that appeasement was the only way that peace could be attained in Europe. He believed that “settling differences” was the most adequate way to deal with aggressors (Document 5). Furthermore, British historian A.J.P. Taylor concluded that appeasement was, at the time, the only logical policy that could provide relief. He stated in his novel The Origins of the Second World War, “Can any sane man suppose… that other countries could have intervened by armed forces in 1933 to overthrow Hitler when he had come to power by constitutional means and was apparently supported by a large majority of the German people. The Germans put Hitler in power” (Document 8). This quotation reveals how Taylor believes that appeasement was the most convenient policy because Hitler had the support and unity in Germany that was required for his ideas to flourish. Overall, although appeasement may have seemed like a relatively beneficial policy, it was in fact a negative and futile
The article “Teens Against Hitler” by Lauren Tarshis, describes the great challenges Ben, his family, and many other Jewish families faced over the rule of Adolf Hitler and the Nazis amid World War II. History Since the end of World War II in 1918 Germany had been struggling, and their community was in no condition for war (6). But, Hitler took power by tapping into those feelings, and declared that Germans were superior to everyone else (6). Adolf Hitler was plotting the annihilation of Europe’s 9.5 million
Appeasement caused Hitler to become more aggressive, with each victory he gained more power and confidence that he was able to put toward his next victory. Winston Churchill expressed in document 6 “I think of all the opportunities to stop the growth of Nazi power which have been thrown away”. Due to Hitler being appeased multiple times, he continued to expand. His desire to expand came from the longing to show that Germany was superior to other countries. When he was appeased this showed the countries were giving in and showing weakness to Hitler.
The Allied Nations of Great Britain and France is the reason why Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and began the second world war. One of the major causes of World War II that could have been prevented was how unfair the Treaty of Versailles was to
17 million deaths was how WWI ended and the treaty of Versailles that came soon after that was supposed to help make peace helped start a secondary war. In Europe not long after WWI ended on November 11, 1918 the Versailles Treaty was being made with leaders from the countries involved in the war such as France, England, the US. But, Germany was deliberately excluded. This essay will address the question of how the Versailles Treaty helped cause World War II. The Treaty of Versailles helped cause World War II by treating Germany harshly.
During the interwar period, Germany’s economy grew worse and worse, arousing anger among the entire German population. Hitler saw this discontent, and used the failing economy to incite nationalism among his people, propelling him to power and war. Germany’s failed economy is arguably the result of aggressive reparations set on them by the Treaty of Versaille. Following WWI, the Allied forces agreed Germany was responsible “for all the damage done to the civilian population of the Allied and Associated Powers and to their property”
World War II DBQ World War II was one of the most devastating and disastrous time periods in the world. World War II spanned from the years 1939-1945 and approximately 60,000,000 people were killed. (OI) During the war, the Japanese, allied with the Axis Powers, attacked an American harbor in Hawaii.
In 1939, the world was plunged into World War II. This happened as a result of Germany remilitarizing the Rhineland, violating the Treaty of Versailles in the process, leaders in Europe assuming power through intimidation and creating laws depriving citizens of basic civil rights, German expansion into other areas of Europe, an attempt to appease Germany through the Munich Agreement, and political and economic instability in the major European countries. This conflict brought up appeasement and collective security, both of which were used before the war in an attempt to prevent it, as responses to aggression. Of the two, collective security is the most effective response to aggression because it has a great chance of ensuring the maintenance
Hitler was the main aggressor during 1939 who everyone appeased to, who is infamously known for his rise to power, his persecution of Jews, and his attacks on the world to dominate, that killed so many. Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, believed in the policy of appeasement and appeased Hitler at the Munich Conference which eventually lead to the start of World War II. The Western Powers responded to aggression with appeasement, and in 1939 the world was plunged into World War II, proving to the world that collective security is a better response to aggression. Hitler’s aggression was the main reason why Allied powers felt the need to appease. In 1930, after the Reichstag fire, Adolf Hitler rose to power because he was appointed
One of the largest wars in history could have been stopped if the right path had been taken. Before World War 2, the countries of the war were stumped on how to deal with the German power that was increasing in power and hoping to dictate the world. The two options of foreign policy that could change the course of history were appeasement and collective security. Appeasement was the option of, giving the aggressor Germany what they wanted in hope that it would lead to peace. The countries agreed on this policy when they established the Munich Agreement, which would give a portion of Czechoslovakia to Germany.
Chapter 2: Hitler and Nazis: Hitler’s ideology and the impacts “Darwinism by itself did not produce the Holocaust, but without Darwinism... neither Hitler nor his Nazi followers would have had the necessary scientific underpinnings to convince themselves and their collaborators that one of the world’s greatest atrocities was really morally praiseworthy.” - Richard Weikart, From Darwin to Hitler January 30th 1933 saw Adolf Hitler become chancellor of Germany. Many think of Hitler as amoral, and when looking at the great evils which he committed it is understandable to see why one would think this. However, Hitler believed that his ideas of war and genocide were morally praiseworthy, (Weikart, (2004)). Hitler promoted the extinction of criminality
World War II and The Book Thief ` World War II, marked by mass atrocities and human suffering was shaped by beauty and brutality. A paradox so contradictory, that understandings lies in the views of the people affected by the events. The war-torn events during the time period of 1939 through 1945 illustrates the paradox between good and evil in Germany. World War II exploded as, a war between many of the axis Powers including Germany, Italy, Japan and the allied Powers-Britain, France, USA, China and many more. During this period, Adolf Hitler, a German politician, and leader of the Nazi party, came into power. Hitler portrayed Germany as a desperate nation and he promised to bring Germany back up to its perceived greatness.
My first thoughts before I have done any research, are what I think is the most important factor to the rise of Nazi power; this is in my opinion probably the Treaty Of Versailles. This is because many of the other factors were caused or affected by the Treaty. However this is only my opinion, so in the following essay I am going to show my ideas after research of course, following on from this I will be planning to make a conclusion, deciding on which point I think that is the most important to Hitler’s significance of the rise of the Nazi part. Hitler 's contribution to the rise of the Nazi party has been seen by many to be a matter of being in the “right place at the right time”, the people who say this also say that anybody could have been picked to lead the Nazi party and, they would have taken the Nazi party to the same heights as Hitler, just not as quickly as he did. Personally I do not agree with this and see that if Hitler had not been such a strong and persuasive speaker, the German people would not have backed the Nazis with the same force as they did.
World War I showed people greater and worse sides of the world. It showed them the weak and the strong. Though some may disagree, World War I, was the most devastating war in history because it had unexpected results, took decades to shape, and lead Hitler to power. The war helped topple monarchs Russia (World).
Another cause of World War II was the Japan militarism and invasions in China in the 1930s. Additionally, another cause of World War II was that Great Depression left the world in a turmoil. The government was unstable, people were out of work, and trying to survive this terrible period in United States history. World War two had many causes as it was fought by the 2 Axis Powers (Germany, Italy, Japan), and the Allied Powers( Britain, United States, Soviet Union, France) , and considered the most traumatic war in human