Conflict Between 1820 And 1860 Dbq Essay

Much of the disagreement between the north and south was caused by the status of slavery, particularly what would happen in expansion states. The northern states wanted to eliminate slavery from new states, and ideally they wanted no slavery in the country in general. On the other hand, southern states believed that slavery should expand with the country. For example, a man from Georgia argued that new territory should be able to have the choice as to whether or not they will have slavery. But the north, however, “insists that while the territory was partly acquired by Southern men, is partly owned by Southern men, that they shall be excluded from its soil”(Document B).

While they did not always agree, they at least could manage their differences. By 1860, the tables had turned. The country was not willing to negotiate with their rival. The South was not willing to stand down for the cause of slavery and the North was not willing to stand for the cause of slavery. Both the North and the South had too much pride that was not going to be swallowed any time

In 1808, slavery was gone in the Northern states but in the South it still remained a part of their life. This caused the beginning of smuggling slave into the states. As time went by there grew political problems between the northern states and southern states. Feuding grew causing blood to be shed. The Issue eventually led to them seceding from the union (Slavery in America).

Though the Southern Representative did not want for this to happen they were overruled by Benjamin Franklin who signed his name on the petition to end the slavery that had been going around. This was one of the moments where the people of America did not lose hope in there government but took pride because they saw a change. Now some change is good if it follows the right morals, but what the people in today’s society are trying to change has gotten out of hand. Ellis also mention how it can be noticed that the government officials had always talked about slavery behind closed doors and that they did not speak openly about it.

Northern and Southern opinions on slavery differed greatly and caused a major divide. While the South fully supported slavery, the Northern citizens were abolitionists set on dissolving the act. Northern Whigs were major abolitionists before and during the Civil War. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 forced all African-Americans in the US to become slaves if they were found by any slave owner, even if he was not their own. This law applied to the entirety of the country, thus making free African-Americans subject to slavery and inhibiting the Whigs from legally protecting any remaining Northern African-Americans (Document M).

DBQ: Political Disputes 1820-1860 For forty-four years, the United States of America was a thriving country. We had won our independence from Great Britain and we had started to create a country that would change the world. Yet, in the year 1860, a joined country and political agreement between all states seemed utterly impossible. People fought with each other so deeply about slavery, the country was divided between slave and free states. By the time of 1820 through 1860, political disagreement grew so large, there had been only one answer.

Did you ever want to know why we were never to find a compromise on slavery which lead us to the civil war. Well he reason that the US was not able to find a compromise on slavery for 40 years. Is because the north and south were never able to agree on a compromise in the government and with the people. I will be showing you this through 3 sources that are. Uncle Toms Cabin, The Election of 1860 and John brown.

The North should have been more aggressive when it came to the South in regards to slavery”. Another reason why the they shouldn’t done the compromises was because in Article IV, Section 2. This is the fugitive-slave clause which reads:“No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom Service or Labour may be due”. This clause explains that no person held in service (which implied slavery) or labor in one state, and under that state’s laws, can escape into another state and be relieved of his services. Even if a slave escapes to a free state with laws prohibiting slavery, he still must be returned to his rightful owner to whom he owes his services in the slave state.

During the early 1800s, the North and the South had severe political differences ranging from different interpretations of the federal laws to state laws. With the addition of the Louisiana Purchase, the North and the South disputed between the division of the new lands, which caused even more disagreement. The different conflicts caused sectionalism in which each region became aware of their own beliefs and their own methods. The South began to believe they were politically inferior in terms of electing an official in their favors and interpreting the laws, as compared to their Northern counterparts, which led to the South’s decision to secede, giving rise to the Civil War.

Tensions between the north and the south were building up prior to the Civil War as slavery became a heated issue between those two regions. The Fugitive Slave Law of 1850 required

The Unsuccessful Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 In the time of slavery, the North and the South struggled to find a balance over African Americans civil rights. The United States began to segregate into the Union states, those who did not support slavery, and the Confederate states, those who did support slavery. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was among one of the many acts enforced during this time. It was ultimately unsuccessful in establishing peace between the North and the South because it was not a peace intended act, it was ineffective, and it upset both sides.

This divide in the government made it hard for the states to work together, and “the inability to take decisive action against slavery in the decades immediately following the Revolution permitted the size of the enslaved population to grow… eventually over 600,000 Americans would die… to resolve the crisis” (88). Had the Northerners spoken up for what they knew was right, the nation might have been able to civilly reach an agreement. However, since the Northerns chose silence, but did not conform to Southern ways, bitterness developed between the two sides, and years later the Civil War

If a southerner wants to get a slave all they have to is get a certificate from a southern judge saying that it is his or her slave. The northerners were outraged because slavery was outlawed in the north so they didn't want to be a part of it. Many of the northerners were abolitionists. An abolitionist is

The reason it was a problem was because our new government was going to be a government of equal rights and liberty for all people even slaves. So people argued what they should do about slavery. The South wanted slaves to be represented not taxes in other words they didn’t want slavery to go away, but the North wanted slaves to be taxed not represented so slavery can end. Until their final decision was to postpone this until 1808 if they hadn’t the united states would have not stopped slavery. If the fight to end slavery didn’t happen then the United States would not have equal rights and liberty for all their citizens this would have affect the equal rights to vote for every citizen making the whole government without

In the past United States, the South and the North are different from each other. The South was mainly based on agriculture, while the North is more industrialized after the Industrial Revolution. The South was keeping the old thoughts and old ways. A country would not be peaceful if there were two or more separated groups, for example, the United States before Civil War. The South is agricultural, the South wants to keep slavery because the masters were relied on the slaves to work for them.