Intro The story “Three Billy Goats Gruff” is about three goats who are going to eat some leaves in a field but encounter a troll underneath a bridge, at least in the Norwegian version. There also is a Polish /German version with a wolf on a mountain path. That is one of the main differences between the two different versions. There also are some similarities. For example, there are antagonists in both of the stories. But there are many more similarities than that. Similarities In the story “Three Billy Goats Gruff” there are two different countries telling the story. One is Norway, and the other country is Poland/Germany. Between the two stories, there are differences and similarities. In both of the stories, there is an antagonist. In the Norwegian version of the article "Three billy goats gruff", there is a troll underneath a bridge. "On the way up was a bridge over a cascading stream they had to cross; and under the bridge lived a great ugly troll, with eyes as big as saucers, and a nose as long as a poker." But in the Polish/German version of the article "Three billy goats gruff", there is a wolf on a narrow mountain path. "But a wolf laid himself across the narrow mountain path". Another similarity is that both of the antagonists get hurt by the goats. In the Norwegian version of the article "Three billy goats gruff", this is what happens, "Well, come along! I 've got two spears, And I 'll poke your eyeballs out at your ears; I 've got besides two curling-stones, And I
Plans Both stories, the scarlet ibis and the simon birch story are similar in symbols as in the deer by the lake in the simon birch story, theme as in don’t take someone you love for granted, and setting as in the two boys in both stories were born with undersized hearts. Symbols is one way the two stories are similar, in the Scarlet Ibis story the scarlet ibis symbolizes doodle because the scarlet ibis is weak and expected to die the same as doodle. the second symbol is again in the scarlet ibis, Doodle is seen as a symbol of hope because the doctors and everyone else believe he is going to die but then he lives. Then everyone thinks that he will never walk but his older brother teaches him to.
Those are some similarities for both of these stories.
These two stories may resemble each other in some ways, but their themes are as far apart as can be. Not only are they bringing across different messages, but the way they choose to deliver those messages are unique and diverse. " Even so, I rather think they understand one thing-fear. The fear of pain and the fear of death"(Connell 3). Richard Connell does an exceptional job with incorporating the theme into his writing, and by this citation, he reveals to us the moral of The Most Dangerous Game; you must have empathy for all living creatures.
Some similarities are small, like the magic talking fish; but others, like the underlying motivation to be happy, are very important to the morals of the stories. Both Sergei and the fisherman want to be happy, Sergei wants to be happy alone on quite fishing trips, while the fisherman wants to be happy with his wife. The morals, even though they are tied together, are fairly different. For example, the theme of ‘What of This Goldfish, Would you wish’, doing the right thing, no matter the cost, is not the same as be grateful, which is the theme of ‘The Fisherman and His Wife’. Other differences include: the consequences, setting, and major character motivations.
The first difference would be the trickster, in the story “How Stories Came to Earth” there 's a spider, we know this when the narrator says, “It was long ago in Africa, child, when there was First Spider, Kwaku Anansi,” however in the story, “Coyote Steals Fire,” the trickster is a coyote. Next, though some of the ways that the tricksters show anthropomorphism are similar they also have different ways to show anthropomorphism. In “How Stories Came to Earth,” the spider being the trickster, has a wife, he goes to her for help to capture the four creatures, the spider says, “He first asked his wife, Aso, how he might capture Ononi,”, but in,“Coyote Steals Fire,” the coyote shows anthropomorphism by cheating, and playing games. Also, the things that the tricksters have to go through to get what they want are different. In “How Stories Came to Earth” the spider is offered a deal in return for the stories that he wants, but for the coyote in,“Coyote Steals Fire,” it was not that easy, the coyote had to risk his life to get the fire for the animals around him.
Although both of these stories have many literary elements in the story, the three that are the most important are setting, irony, characterization.
One of the more obvious similarities is that both tricksters in both stories are animals. Another similarity in these stories is they both share anthropomorphism. Anthropomorphism is giving animals
One difference clearly shown is in the short film “Tales of the Unexpected” Billy reacts to the tea, however in the story he does not. In the film, Billy reacted very ferociously and crazily because of the poisonous tea, however in the story he did not react to it at all. I think the screenwriter alters the story to emphasize that the tea was poisonous. Another difference in the film is the screenwriter reveals Mulholland and Temple are in the house taxidermied. In the passage the ending is billy drinking the tea, however the film ends with the landlady revealing Mulholland and Temple are taxidermied and Billy is about to be.
Although both stories have various differences, there are also many similarities. Both the main characters live in a place with no technology and transportation services. The devil disappears at the end of both stories. In “Young Goodman Brown”, the devil suddenly disappears inside the forest after making Goodman Brown realize that everyone in the world has turned evil.
Although both stories are talking about the same towns, they are told through different narratives conveying a completely different tone. The quote told in the third person lacks feeling and emotion, which plays a big role in conveying a strong
Everything in life has similarities and differences as long as you're looking for them, but some have more than others. Comparing similarities and difference between two things in life is making a compare and contrast (book) . When comparing and contrasting two pieces of literature you have to observe not only the themes of them but also the plot. Fences by August Wilson and My Papa's Waltz by Theodore Roethke have many similarities and differences throughout the literature due to themes and the plot.
Although, they have similarity, the two stories has major differences also. First, both author differs the way they introduce and develop their lead characters to the reader. Second, they also differ in perspective from which their stories are being told. Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.
In his story “Hills Like White Elephants”, Ernest Hemingway points out the couple's inability to make the decision: whether to abort the unborn child or not. The reader finds that the story deals with couple's miscommunication through the conversation and the emotions that they express. One can observe that no descriptions are given to the characters, thus, Hemingway creates universal dilemma to focus on the crucial issue. In this way, Hemingway leads the reader to identify with his female character that undergoes a struggle.
Relationships are complicated, but can you imagine what it would have been like back in the late 1800’s and early 1900’s? Women were still expected to live in the stereotypical role where men were in charge. Men still have a lot of power, but women are becoming more and more independent. However, it is interesting to differentiate how a woman author and a man author portray relationships. In Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour” and Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” there are different relationship dynamics portrayed.
The Unbreakable Hold “Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin and “Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers” by Adrienne Rich has several similarities as well as a few differences. Throughout history, women have been expected to submit to their husbands in many ways. They were to do this without any objections. A woman, during the 19th century, secretly dreamed of becoming free of this unnecessary authority. These two stories have one main subject in common: a want for freedom from a husband’s hold in marriage.