Compare And Contrast The Fighting Sides Of The Civil War

The Civil War. Louis P. Masur’s book, The civil War: a Concise History, Is a book that gives an overview of the civil war from 18 to 1800, Providing multiple causes an consequences that emerged from the war. The book begins by reviewing the origins of the war. Chapter one covers the issues between northern and southern states and the tension over right and slave possession. The tension created a conflict that raised a number of political, social, and military events that then proceeded into a battle to abolish slavery from the colonies.

The Civil War is known as one of the most destructive wars of the time with a total casualty rate of about 625,000 soldiers.1 The non-slave owning states, the Union, and the slave owning states, the Confederates, fought each other for power over the national government which would be the deciding factor in whether the upcoming states would or would not be slave states. Each side had its own prominent general, Robert E. Lee of the Confederacy and Ulysses S. Grant of the Union. Many people in America today often have their opinions on who they think was the better of the two so, I’m going to ask you. Who do you think was the greatest general of the American Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant, or Robert E. Lee?

Wars are not won solely based on the number of soldiers, each side possesses. Instead, it is won by demoralizing the enemy and depriving them of the citizens’ assistance. In the American Civil War, the South battled against the North because of their differing views. Graybellies wanted state power, agriculturalism, and slavery. On the other hand, Yankees promoted a strong, federal government; industrialization as their form of economy; and the end of slavery.

As you know being in an army could be quite difficult for soldiers. Both Union soldiers and Confederate soldiers train everyday and do certain duties to get ready for the American Civil War. However, there are huge differences between the two armies. Before the war started, most of the soldiers from both North and South had been farmers. If the Southerners did not farm they either became carpenters, mechanics, merchants, machinist, lawyers, teachers, blacksmiths, or a dentist.

Civil War Fighting Styles During the Civil War, The Union and Confederacy got into a war. The Union adapted the fighting style used by the Teutonics, while the Confederacy adapted to the fighting style used by the Celtic tribe. The fighting styles were very different and unique. It even shifted the tides of the war!

Confederate History verses The People A big issue in today’s United States is removing Confederate history from the public due to the rise of killings involving race groups. Some will argue that doing away with Confederate history will some solve all problems; others argue that erasing Confederate history will not solve anything. The Solution to whether or not to erase Confederate history is to see if American’s history is better off with it or not.

South vs North The south thought they could do what they wanted .Before the Civil War the South depended on slavery and the North was more of a Industrial. Then there were arguments about slavery should not be in the new states .People came up with compromises to fix all the fuss of which state is free and which state is a slave one.

Life for the Union Soldier was not only brutal on the battlefield, but the camp life for a Union soldier was just as cruel. With the lack of personal hygiene, unsavory and repugnant food, and the shortage of clothing made living, a very difficult thing to do. Growth in the number of people with diseases was also a contributing factor to the massive amounts of death within the camp and as well as the post-battle wounds that often left either a man with one less limb or put in a mental institution. A Union Soldier’s life during the Civil War was cruel and horrific during their stay at the camps.

The Battle of Gettysburg, like the rest of the war, was between two armies with their own social structure, including their own values, needs, history, religion, customs, and culture. Each army had their own values. One side believed in succession and becoming its own sovereign state while the other believed in remaining whole. The Confederate Army believed slavery was justifiable while the Union Army believed it to be inhumane. During the battle, the people’s needs and both armies’ needs became apparent.

McPherson regards the Civil war as a much more ideological struggle and he discusses the ideological factors that motivated men to enlist, stay enlisted, fight and risk death in battle. He argued that the powerful motivating sources for soldiers to join the army were duty, honor, and patriotism (McPherson, 5). According to a book review by George Rable, he stated that its true that duty and honor were dominant values for those soldiers in the nineteenth century, however this posed a jaded view from the twentieth-century readers. McPherson stresses the importance of slavery as one of the principal ideological considerations as to why men fought.

The lack of food is a dreadful hardship the soldiers have to deal with. This hardship brings about not just hunger but many other factors. When you are hungry from the lack of food, you are weak and because you are weak you cannot fight well or deal with simple problems well. This effects basicly the whole war in a way. If the soldiers can’t fight, they will fail.

David White describes the history of the United States Military during a period post-Civil war from 1865-1898. He describes this era in a manner that described the chronological order of conflict, demobilization, and innovative growth of the U.S. Military. White describes in detail the utilization of these new technologies and weapon systems, and in his words the “professional introspection” of the U.S. Military. White captured the innovations during the civil war with quantitative data.

During the Civil War, families were torn apart and left to fend for themselves. The citizens had to hold the responsibility of supporting themselves and their military strength. Citizens did their best to keep soldiers up for the fight. The citizens would determine the outcome of the Civil War. Citizens funded their soldiers so that the war would end.

The people knew that they had to keep the troops fed to have a chance at winning. They often ate food that was hard to ship across sees, such as fresh fruit and vegetables, so they could send the heartier stuff overseas (Schumm, 2014). People realized food was a very important weapon in war because soldiers, civilians, and children require it to keep the cycle of supplying the Allie’s going. Food shortages often led to protests and riots, so the government was trying very hard to get everybody to do their part and save food. Food was so important, that it could possibly decide who would win the war.

The two most contested theories as to the origins of the American Civil war of 1861 to 1865 lie in the government support of slavery or as states’ rights supersession of federal rule. Both rely on the Southern ideal of states’ being able to operate their own supreme law within the confines of their borders; the slavery argument claims that slavery was the prominent issue that these southern states wished to control, while the states’ rights argument claims that slavery was just one of the many grievances that the South had towards their northern brethren. Reid goes on to assert, with the aid of many political decisions, treatises, economic sanctions, et cetera were actually based on the South’s need of the slavery institution. The first of