Compare And Contrast Jackson Dbq

When the indians were being removed to the west over 4,000 cherokees died. These indians died because the U.S wanted more land which was not right because they were here first. This was called “The Trail of Tears”. On May 28 1830 two years later after Andrew Jackson was elected as the president, he signed the Removal Act. Before the Cherokees left their land they refused.

Jackson presidency was marked as a new era in Indian-Anglo American relations by imitating a policy of Indian removal. Before the removal, he made about 70 treaties with Native American tribes both in the South and the Northwest. His First Annual Message to Congress and some others begins in December of 1829, which contained remarks on the present and future state of American Indians in the United States. He argued that it was for the Indians own well, that they should be resettled on the vacant lands west of the Mississippi River. During the time in Congress, debates on a bill didn’t begin until late February 1830.

Several states passed laws limiting Native American sovereignty and rights and encroaching on their territory. In a few cases, such as Cherokee Nation v. Georgia and Worcester v. Georgia, the U.S. Supreme Court were against these practices and affirmed that native nations were sovereign nations “in which the laws of Georgia and other states can have no force. As President Andrew Jackson himself noted in 1832, that if no one intended to enforce the Supreme Court’s rulings then the decisions would , in his own words, “[fall]…still born.” Basically, if no one enforced the Supreme Court’s ruling, then it might as well never happened. “Estimates based on tribal and military records suggest that approximately 100,000 indigenous people were forced from their homes during that period, which is sometimes known as the removal era, and that some 15,000 died during the journey west.”

This piece of text shows that Jackson made a cruel decision in forcing the Indians to march west, and he did not take in the fact that the march was going to be so brutal and harsh for them. Additionally, in Document B, the text stated,” Andrew Jackson has a pretty checkered history. He was a rugged mountain man to say the least but he was also the one that relocated Native American tribes out of all of the south east part of the United States and did forcible removal and tens of thousands of Native Americans died on the trail of tears and other things.” As shown by

In the 1800s, the Jacksonian Democrats were a major political group in the United States. This party had great social, economic, and political effects. Jacksonian politics and the biblical belief of honoring God deserve to be explored and compared in order to better understand both views. Once this exploration is complete, it can be concluded that Jacksonian politics, as a whole, cannot be compatible with the biblical view of honoring God because it undermined the value of community and equality, supported manipulative rule, and contradicted its own doctrines through questionable and even sinful actions. It is important to establish what Christianity says about honoring God in order to compare these two views.

Starting in 1828 the United States experienced the “Jacksonian Era”, where Andrew Jackson, the first recognized democratic president, lead our country. His time of rule is often looked at as of time of “democratization of politics.” This means that the government was becoming representatives of the people's voice, and this is exactly what Jackson believed in. He showed his democratic beliefs through many things throughout his presidency. The democratization of politics is very evident in the Jacksonian Era through things such as voting, Indian removal, and being financially in favor of the people’s wants and needs individually, rather than as a whole, because although many times he was harsh in his ways, his end goal was to ensure the people

Jackson was the first president to use the “Spoil System” at the extent he used it. The “Spoil System” is when a president fires most or all government officials and replaces them with his own friends or supporters. Document 6 said that Jackson appointed a criminal as a New York tax collector. He stole 1.2 million dollars before he was caught. Also, he ignored the Supreme Court’s ruling when he made thousands of Native Americans leave their home and walk the “Trail of Tears.”

While Andrew Jackson may have believed he was helping the common man and ruling for the majority, his unfair and inconsistent presidency was reflected in his treatment of Native Americans, the National Bank, and the Nullification crisis. Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act into law in order to move Native American’s out of their own land to move in American settlers. For one, the Natives had no rights and no real way to reason with the US government, making it easy to remove them from any land East of the Mississippi. Jackson wanted to help the majority of Americans, but did not speak for the majority of Native Americans, who he considered savages and uncivilized. Jackson’s role in the nullification crisis was very important, as he helped increase sectionalism in the South.

He was unhappy with the cooperation of South Carolina so he unjustly forced the problem to benefit his side of the argument by passing his own law which was very unpresidential. Andrew Jackson was a more as a child, a spoiled child then as a president. Instead of doing his homework and eating his vegetables he

He believed that all voting rights should given to all white men, and that you don’t need to be rich or own property to vote. But he still excluded women and African Americans. Under his presidency, he disbanded all parties and created a new part called the Democratic Party which is still in formation today. Jackson had a huge problem facing the Union called the Miss South Carolina nullification crisis. South Carolina were irritated about the high federal tariff on imported goods, which helped New Englands at the expense of southern planters.

In the journal article “ Andrew Jackson versus the Historians”, author Charles G. Sellers explained the various interpretations of Jackson, from the viewpoint of Whig historians and Progressive Historians. These interpretations were based on the policies of Jackson. The Whig historians viewed the former president in a negative way. They considered him arrogant, ignorant, and not fit for being president. Sellers pointed out that it was not just because of “Jackson’s personality…nor was it the general policies he pursued as president”

He and the Democratic Party he brought with him to Congress sought to protect the Constitution, which they strongly believed was the exact way the country needed to be run. The Jacksonian Democrats fought for a smaller and less influential federal government, that shared its powers almost equally with individual state governments and the people in charge of industry. The party upheld these standards partially, but the effects of their actions regarding them, didn’t exactly turn out the way they had intended. Ultimately, the Jacksonians may have had great intentions, but the power and greed that came with having control once it was earned twisted their views slightly, and made them more selfish, and less Democratic. They inspired the creation of new political parties and movements, which criticized them for their hypocrisy, and shaped the way modern Republicans think and act in the world

Andrew Jackson; a True Monster The president of the U.S., a loyal chivalrous man. His personality says hero, but his actions contradict. He murdered thousands and forced people out of their homeland. The man is none other than Andrew Jackson.

Georgia Supreme Court case. The court ruled that the Native Americans were its own individual community, so they have the right to their own territory. Andrew Jackson, however, hated this ruling. He and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, which forced the Native Americans to move out of their rightful home to westward of the Mississippi, a place unfamiliar to them. Natives Americans who defied Jackson were forced out by his military, which then brought upon the Trail of Tears.

He was selfish, he took land that rightfully belonged to the Indians and didn 't feel guilty about it. The battle he is known best for is the battle of New Orleans, he won the battle but that battle was not necessary. He was a sore loser, when he didn 't win president the first time around he accused Adams of corruption. When he became president he wanted to get rid of paper money, he hated it. Think about it for a minute, if he hated paper money, why should he be on it?