Casey Anthony Essay

Women convicted of “other property offenses” – a category of crimes that includes arson, receiving stolen property and breaking and entering — received shorter prison sentences. • Black female defendants were, in some ways, treated differently than white female defendants. Black women were assigned higher bond amounts and were more likely to be sent to prison than white women. Women of both races were equally likely to be released prior to

Every action she took showed that” (10). Throughout the entire investigation, the evidence was all there but the way it was presented in trial and the way the defense attacked it added a lot of doubt into the jury’s mind and that is what caused them to deliver the not guilty verdict. This case is considered a controversial case. There are a few factors that causes it to be considered controversial.

Innocent until proven guilty is a phrase the United States justice system says we abide by but in many cases this seems to falter from true. Due to various factors such as tunnel vision, faulty forensics, false confessions, improper identification, missing evidence and the list could go on; all of these reasons can lead to a biased trial and ultimately lead to a wrongful conviction. Julie Rea was a single mom convicted of the murder of her ten year old son Joel Kirkpatrick on October 13th, 1997. This twenty-eight year old mom and her son lived in a rural area in Lawrence, Illinois that was referred to as a quaint little town that very rarely saw any crime so when the news of sweet little Joel Kirkpatrick being murdered got out it sent the

To have a law passed under the name of a victim is world-wide changing, as the terrible acts could be restored into the criminal justice system today. Although, the circumstance of any law passed by legislation is too hard to understand why would anyone want to commit such a horrific crime, the answers, we may never know. As many Americans may remember it, the world stopped on July 15, 2008 as people heard across the nation on the news, radio, and perhaps social media. A two-year old little girl from Orlando Florida was missing, and her name was Caylee Marie Anthony. Casey Marie Anthony gave birth to Caylee on August 9, 2005 in Orlando Florida.

Megan Reese Argumentation and Persuasion Paper III Why O.J Got Away with Murder: A Murray Ogborn Application Physical evidence, DNA proof, and a violent past history could seal the fate of OJ Simpson in the controversial murder trial of his wife Nicole Brown. Although so much damming evidence pointed that he was the murderer, on October 3rd 1995 a jury reached the verdict of not guilty. How does a murderer get away with murder when there is a vast amount of scientific evidence and testimonials presented to a jury? Murray Ogborn, a redound trial lawyer, would argue that the District Attorney (D.A) did not tell the right story, and thus the jury could not remember or relate to all the factual evidence presented during the 9

In July 2008, the Criminal Justice System began one the most horrified case in the United States. This case called the attention of many civilians around the nation; making it one of the most controversial cases in this time. However, Casey Anthony was the primary suspect in this case, the police have enough evidence to arrest her. After Anthony Casey arrest the trial begin until the case was resolved and a sentence is concluded. It is a process involved different government agencies.

Moving from the courtroom, the fairness of the justice system continues in the jury room. Moving from the courtroom, the fairness of the justice system continues in the jury room. After some arguing the jurors agree that if everyone gets a fair trial then the defendant should too because that is how it works, “Everybody gets a fair trial, that's the system.” (Rose.12). The American justice system ensures that everyone would get a fair trial until they are proven guilty.

These biases lead to discriminatory outcomes such as harsher sentences for defendants who are members of marginalized groups. Many people from different backgrounds or beliefs struggle with their own safety or even their basic human rights. 18 percent of remedied cases were due to false guilty pleas. People that have been accused of these crimes were ones that had to confront struggles of discrimination. Many factors like the location, the judge and especially the jury is what causes people to be falsified as guilty.

Certain jurors can be easily swayed. A good example of this is juror 2 promptly adopting the opinions of the other jurors without much reason. “Oh. Well… I just think he’s guilty. I thought it was obvious.

Out of the 337 cases where innocent men and women were wrongfully imprisoned nearly half of the true suspects were identified and convicted. The racial heritage of those who have been exonerated is fairly diverse, consisting of “206 African Americans, 104 Caucasians, 25 Latinos, and 2 Asian Americans” (The Innocence Project). (Transition) Although The Innocence Project has changed the lives of many who others would not afford them the opportunity to prove their innocence, they would not have been able to do so without the recent

This shows that the big, strong, and wealthy white men are typically the ones that are not convicted. This shows racism, sexism, and just a hate for the poor. According to “How the Judicial System Works”, “Each state also has its own set of courts that can adapt to the needs of its people.” This could say that if the people want it, the state may provide it.

The article, Marcia Clark Is Redeemed, details Marcia Clark, the leading prosecutor’s, thoughts and interpretations of the

Jurors have to make a verdict and share their different opinions of the evidence and proof. Also, being open-minded to new information is necessary throughout the jury room because you can't be stuck onto one piece of evidence through the discussion. In Twelve Angry Men, juror 3 was stuck onto his vote for guilty due to his own experience from his son. He was also stuck on the evidence of how the old man and the woman from across the street supposedly saw the defendant kill his father. This shows how the jurors can be unpredictable and also lead onto emotions and past experience.

Unfortunately, in this case the prosecution did a poor job on linking all evidence to Casey Anthony that proved she murdered her daughter. The prosecution ignored a single plain legitimate notion “Corpus Delicti” requirement and due to that failure of addressing it the jury was forced to give a “not guilty” verdict from the beginning of the

They have to decide important matters, verdicts, without giving reasons about their decision (Hostettler, 2004); they can nullify a verdict even if the evidence is overwhelming (Joyce, 2013). Furthermore, juries are too expensive, prolong the length of the trial (Davies, 2015) and the guilty can walk free, while the innocent is convicted (Joyce, 2013). In addition, jurors should be representative of society, but it is not