Case Citation: Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center 151 AD 3d 1349 - NY: Appellate Div., 3rd Dept. 2017 Background: In this civil case Timothy W. Gallagher is the appellant, and Cayuga Medical Center (CMC) is the respondents. The case took place in the appellate division of the supreme court of New York, division three. The plaintiff’s complaint was that Cayuga Medical Center had asserted medical malpractice, negligence, wrongful death and emotional distressed. This case was decided on June 15, 2017. Issue: This cases issue involved Timothy W. Gallagher bringing an action of medical malpractice, negligence, wrongful death, and emotional distress suit against Cayuga Medical Center for releasing his son from the hospital when he was having suicidal …show more content…
The Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center case was then appealed by the plaintiffs. Facts: This is a civil case. The Plaintiff of this case is Timothy W. Gallagher, the parent of Jack O’Bannon Gallagher (deceased). Jack was sent to the emergency room after his high school nurse believed he might have abused a substance in which he was acting strangely and had elevated blood pressure. The decedent was omitted into the hospital and was seen by multiple medical professionals who evaluated both his physical health and mental state. The decedent was later released from the hospital after being cleared by the psychiatrist for discharge and later committed suicide by shooting himself in the head. The Respondent, Cayuga Medical Center, is where multiple physicians; Christopher Scianna and Drew Koch, a registered nurse; Meghan Beeby, and an on-duty psychiatrist; Auguste Duplan, had evaluated the decedent’s health and mental …show more content…
Galynker also never explained why an algorithm could have provided a different result or what questions could have been generated to alter a medical decision. With this, the court deemed Galynker’s affirmation conclusive and lacked sufficient detail. Galynker also stated that Koch did not examine the case with Duplan and did not consider the drug use of the decedent, but this information was later omitted due to Galynker’s lack of expertise in emergency
Medical Malpractice Case Study Karen Gonzalez Southern New Hampshire University The case of Smith vs. Haugland and the Iowa Heart and Vascular Clinic is a medical malpractice case in which the parties involved include the plaintiffs, a woman named Louetta Smith and her husband Richard and the defendant, a cardiologist named Dr. Frank Haugland and the clinic in which he practiced, the Iowa Heart and Vascular Care Clinic. The plaintiffs sued for malpractice after the defendant performed a procedure on Louetta in which she had complications and irreversible life changing harm. The plaintiffs believed that the defendant performed an unnecessary procedure and that he did not obtain an informed consent. Louetta Smith was 76 years
1. Name and Citation of the Case: Melfi v. Mount Sinai Hosp., 64 A.D.3d 26, 29, 877 N.Y.S.2d 300 (1st Dept. 2009) 2. Nature of the Case: This case analyzed the constitutional right of hospitals handling the deceased without consent or without notification to the family.
Both victims sued Centennial Hills Hospital in civil court, claiming the hospital knew or should have know Mr. Farmer was a threat. One case was settled without going to trial in 2013. The other victim committed suicide in 2013, but her claim is still being
In the Shea v. Esensten case, there was a lot of information that was compared to different laws. “Mr. Shea's doctor persuaded Mr. Shea, who was then forty years old, that he was too young and did not have enough symptoms to justify a visit to a cardiologist. A few months later, Mr. Shea died of heart failure” (Shea v. Esensten, 1997). The given information brought into question, why would the doctor not make a referral for Mr. Shea? “Mr. Shea had been an employee of Seagate Technologies, Inc. (Seagate) for many years.
R/s James Maxwell Pittman is believed to be a vulnerable adult due to his mental illness. R/s Mr. Pittman mental capacity is of a 12-year-old. R/s Mr. Pittman lives with his mother, Judy Pittman and it was reported to the reporter that Ms. Pittman is abusing Mr. Pittman. R/s Mr. Pittman has an infection in his mouth and he has not been taken to the dentist. R/s Mr. Pittman is not being made to bathe nor is Ms. Pittman is bathing him.
-Classification An unnamed teen had been charged with 2 counts of second degree murder and one count of arson causing bodily harm. The maximum sentence for a youth commiting second degree murder is 7 years and the maximum sentence for a a youth committing arson causing bodily harm (disregard for human life) has a maximum sentence of life. -Summary `The teenager at the time was 17 and living in a foster home.
Dr. Kevorkian: Observed Through a Microscope Dr. Kevorkian was responsible for the deaths of many people through the process of assisted suicide. He conducted more than 130 throughout his career, most of them were committed during the 1990’s. Because he assisted in the suicides of so many people, he faced scrutiny unlike any other case in the past.
Presenting Problem: Carter is currently admitted to the Devereux Intensive Resiidential Treatment Center as of 12/1/2015. Hx of being aggressive with family members. Admission occurred as a result of texting homicidal ideations regarding his mother, in which he threatened to cut her throat and or the brake lies on her car. He reports experiencing auditory and visual hallucinations sine the age of 12, records reports the hallucinations began at age 10. He denies feeling depressed but had symptoms of depression in the past.
My father’s health also worsened during this time. His right foot began to swell from the long walks to the Justice Center in Downtown Cleveland to visit Larry, and this affected his work. One day at work, a mental health patient brutally attacked my father. He could not get away fast enough because of his injured foot. My father died just days after his attack.
Sainz told me the following information: Sainz was approached by Lane, who told her that he felt suicidal and was planning on hurting himself. Lane reportedly did not specify how he was going to kill himself. Based on Lane’s and Sainz’ statements made to us, Clinician Vasquez formed the opinion that he was a danger to himself. We placed Lane on a WIC 5150-Mental Health Hold. I transported Lane to the Olive View UCLA Medical Center for evaluation.
Introduction Unfortunately, legal and ethical issues are prevalent among social workers that are attempting to provide effective care for individuals, specifically individuals who are within the mental health population. Examples of prevalence of legal and ethical issues are the Tarasoff I and Tarasoff II cases. The aforementioned cases sparked the infiltration of Tarasoff and the Duty to protect after Prosenjit Poddar murdered Tatiana Tarasoff, his romantic interests who he had became obsessed with. Tarasoff’s family members filed a lawsuit accusing mental healthcare professionals of negligence. The Tarasoff’s were allotted the ability to settle out of court, but no amount of money will bring back their loved one, who could have been potentially
After reading this case I was terribly shocked about the fact that something like this could happen in our medical history. I couldn’t believe how a patient could be neglected so much. Based on the material that we have learned the lack of ethical theory of deontology in Dr. Evan was disturbing. As a doctor Dr. Evan’s role is to care for patients, keep them away from harm and prolong their life. Though in the trial he stated as if he didn’t care.
The scientific study that it presented was over 10 years old, held in low regard by prior courts, and had a weakness observed by its own medical witness Given the absence of a control group, a very small sample size, and its datedness, the study would have not have stood up at a high school science fair, and should not have stood up in court. Furthermore, the government’s witness could not use his medical experience to support the government’s venture, because his patients were not proven to be similar enough to Mr. Whitman. Finally, the government tried to use an incomplete medical record to justify the forced medication of Mr. Whitman. The record showed that he had been handed the drugs the government wanted to use on him but did little to show evidence that they had actually been
Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.
Outline Goal: inform Introduction Miss Chanwalee Srisukho (The Medical Council of Thailand spoke woman) warned the Thai graduates to treat patients with care. Chanwalee’s message implied that more doctors are being sued. Her message aimed toward obstetricians and gynaecologists as they got lots of medical malpractice lawsuits.