Unfortunately, Bihr is not able to persuade the audience members who hold negative attitudes on vaccinations. The statements by Lillvis, Kirkland, & Frick (2014) and the Pew Research Center (2015) present evidence that audience members do not find vaccines effective and will not change their attitudes, or personal feelings on the topic. Since attitudes are difficult to change, Bihr’s different forms of rational arguments and value of family are unable to alter audience views on the topic. On the other hand, Bihr’s strategies can change the audience’s belief that vaccinations are avoidable, with regards to religious views. Although religious claims are available when avoiding vaccinations, the statistics cause the audience to realize the effects of it and change their actions on vaccines. Since the statistics show …show more content…
Bihr informs the audience with supporting evidence by Ferdinands et al. (2014) and Dr. Cave (2015) that vaccinations reduce the risks of viruses and protects children. When applying Bihr’s narrative, statistics, and value, the rhetoric is more effective because the audience can agree with Bihr’s points and share a common ground on the topic of protection. The strategies of value of family and the need for longevity supports the situational advantage in the form of cultural factors, since most cultures share common perspectives on family and life. The audience is able to understand that on a global scale, a diversity of parents encourage vaccinations to increase their lifespan, which may influence them to take action themselves. With the Pew Research Center’s report stating that audience members hold similar expectations of vaccinations, the pathos used in the concern for family and the need for longevity strategies work effectively to support the audience
Petts and Niemeyer explore the controversy debate on what affects people from not getting their children vaccinated. They did a poll on who gets their children vaccinated and who does not get their children vaccinated. One factor Petts and Niemeyer discuss is why people are second guessing getting vaccinations for their children. The media has presented information, which led to false reports, although parents are acting upon these messages in which change their beliefs in vaccinations. Media has since affected the idea of vaccinations, parents are beginning to look into the vaccinations and predict if they will be mandatory or not for their children.
In his book, Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All, Paul A. Offit, M.D. presents us with a thoroughly in-depth look behind the veil of the vaccine controversy. Specifically here in the United States. Offit starts us off with the history of vaccinations giving insights into not just their creation but the controversy that has surrounded them since the beginning. We learn how these questions around safety and personal rights started and who have been the major decision makers in history. We hear about the groups and people that support vaccinations and those that do not.
Requiring vaccinations is a highly debatable topic in the United States today. An article by Ronald Bayer, “The continuing tensions between individual rights and public health,” is one of the most reliable sources in the case study. The author has a PhD from the University of Chicago and focuses his research on issues of social justice and ethical matters. Bayer has also previously been a consultant to the World Health Organization on ethical issues related to public health. This makes him very knowledgeable about the topic and a highly credible source.
On the other hand, Bihr gains an audience related advantage of safety values when she addresses the topic of protecting children from harm; Bihr explains that administering vaccines helps protect children from illnesses like the influenza virus or rotavirus. Researchers Ferdinands et al. (2014) found that the “…influenza vaccination was associated with about a three-quarters reduction in risk of influenza-related critical illness in children… Our results highlight the value of increasing the use of influenza vaccines among children” (Ferdinands et al., 2014, p. 681); while Dr. Cave’s (2014) piece, Adolescent refusal of MMR inoculation: F (mother) v F (father), adds that “A global vaccination campaign has led to a 71 per cent drop in measles-related deaths between 2000 and 2011, making a huge impact on the death rate which was estimated at 2.6 million deaths per year in the 1980s” (Cave, 2014, p. 631).
Partner Summary The article “Should Anti-Vaxers be shamed or Persuaded”, is about how Anti-vaccination protesters should not be bullied or shamed into agreeing with the opposing viewpoint. The author distinguishes the difference between, bullying them into submission, and persuading them to the right side. Though not a parent, the author believes that kids should be vaccinated except in rare cases.
One of the previously mentioned arguments for anti-vaccers was the argument that the vaccine would cause teenagers to act more immorally. This is proven to be false when Dr. Saslow, the lead author of the cancer society’s, updated guidelines and firmly states that there is “no direct connection between the vaccine and sexual activity and no reason to suggest one.” Brody’s mention of the famous doctor effectively persuades the reader to see the truth behind the research. The mention of parents being concerned about the effects these vaccines is considered a rhetorical cannon of relationship. The supposed relationship between the vaccine and physical consequences encountered after being vaccinated is a the main elements behind the anti-vaccers argument.
News Flash! Recent outbreaks of what the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) call vaccine-preventable diseases demonstrate the effects of the anti-vaccination movement. “Antivaxxers” as they’ve come to be called, as noticed on this author's Facebook page, are a population of parents who make a conscious decision not to vaccinate their children. The goal of this paper is to shed some light on the Antivaxxers, their arguments for choosing not to vaccinate their children, and research that proves the Antivaxxers’ theories are wrong. After all, vaccines aren’t something to be concerned about, they are proven to be effective.
Required Immunity Mandatory vaccinations for children in public schools have been the center of much debate since laws were first developed to regulate immunization. Fears from parents about side effects and adverse reactions have steered many away from wanting to vaccinate their children despite the numerous infectious diseases they prevent. These debates have gotten in the way of progression in schools for preventing the spread of disease. To me, the risks of not vaccinating children are far greater than the risks of adverse reactions.
This common good approach drew vociferous protests and the anti-vaccination movement emerged (Stern & Markel, 2005). Today, with the advances in virology and technology, vaccines are, for the most part—safe. Smallpox has been all but eradicated in the world
Teaching that can be done to educate the public should be based on facts and to show evidence that support the effectiveness of immunization. The public need to know the statistics of the benefits of immunization in the America and other part of the world. Parents who refuse immunization for their ignorance has changed the life. When parents come out and talk about devastating experience of life only they have immunized their child, they would have protected them from preventable diseases. Educate the public about how mist diseases such as smallpox has been educated because of immunization.
The stereotypes of vaccines being harmful rather than helpful, and the challenges of free well and freedom to choose ones ' own healthcare practice will be my challenge. However, I believe that this essay will be successful if the right research is provided, and my thoughts are clearly supported. Most of the time we look at medical research and our eyes glaze over. This essay will be in plain English so that anyone regardless of their education or medical degree will understand the importance and benefits of this vaccine and why every child should receive
Many people may think that vaccination is a bad thing, that instead of preventing it causes illness, that is not natural. Natural or not, there are many reasons as to why we should vaccinate us and the younger generation. Most of the time children don’t like vaccination because it hurt, but is the responsibility of a parent to seek the wellbeing of his or her child. Vaccination it’s a preventive measure of various diseases. Unfortunately, things like the anti-vaccination movement, the misinformation on the Internet, and the believe that vaccination causes more damage than is worth, have led our society to think that it’s right not to vaccinate.
Modern medicine provides people with the ability to protect themselves from the world’s most fatal diseases. Merely a century ago, it was not uncommon for a child to die as a result of diseases such as polio, pertussis, and tuberculosis. Today, it is highly unlikely for a person to contract these diseases, let alone die from them. However, refusal of vaccinations has been increasing throughout the years due to the anti-vaccination movement. This movement declares mandatory vaccines unconstitutional and vaccinations overall as the cause of autism.
Disease can overthrow a culture and spread like wildfire when not taken precaution against. However, there exists a fierce opposition against the mandate of vaccination by some groups of interest with the existence of adverse effects by vaccination to the human body as a reason. Although vaccination carries some health risks,
Although all public schools require immunizations, there are still children in the schools whose religion exempts the use of vaccinations. The goal of this paper is