Argumentative Essay On Electoral College

This proposal will give each and every citizen a chance to vote. Statistics show that more people will vote if they know that there vote will make a difference. This proposal fits modern America because it will allow every American to make their voice heard when determing what President should be in office and what changes should be made. This system will allow the election of the President to be easy and fair. Direct Reflection with Instant Runoff Voting could be used with or without the Electoral College in effect.

I think we should keep the Electoral College. Electoral College is defined in our textbook as; “An unofficial term that refers to the electors who cast the states’ electoral votes” (Patterson, T.E., 2013). Electoral voting is tied in with the states popular voting. Choosing electoral college adds to the cohesiveness of the nation by obliging an appropriation of popular support to be elected President, improves the status of minority interests, contributes to the political dependability of the country by promising a two-party system, and keeps up an elected arrangement of government and representation (Kimberling, W.C., 2008). I think that the Electoral College system is a big part of the cohesiveness of our country and it requires the distribution

The Framers of the Constitution created the Electoral College as a compromise between electing the President directly by popular vote and having Congress choose the President. At the time, there were concerns about electing the President directly, such as the lack of communication and travel infrastructure to facilitate a national election and the possibility of uneducated voters being easily swayed by popular demagogues. Additionally, the Framers were concerned that smaller states would be overshadowed by larger ones in a direct popular vote. The Electoral College has several pros and cons.

Many people are not satisfied with the way a president is chosen in the United States. There are two systems of voting that are shown during the election, popular vote, and electoral college. The system that is used to elect the next president is the electoral college. People believe that popular vote should be the way the president should be chosen since it involves the whole citizens of the United States. This is due to the controversy people have given to the electoral college.

The washingtonpost.com says, “Every state is guaranteed at least one seat in the House and two in the Senate.” This shows that the Electoral College gives each state a fair vote according to their size. It also keeps larger states from having too much of an advantage over smaller

Many people think that the popular vote system is more logical than the electoral system. But there are many reasons why the electoral system works better than the popular vote system. The electoral college gives small states an equal opportunity to bigger states. Many small states are ignored due to their population. The second reason is that it safeguards uninformed voters.

Jackson Fullmer Mr. Baker Government March 2nd, 2023 The Electoral College is a system that has been around for a very long time. It is used to determine which President and Vice President candidates are going to be elected. While some argue that it should be replaced with an alternative method, there are several reasons why the Electoral College is the best option for America.

Despite all the criticisms and calls for reform, the Electoral College remains the best system for electing the President. First off, the great Electoral College will ensure that candidates must campaign in a variety of all different states and in a variety of different ways, instead of focusing only on a few large states or bigger population centers.

Why change a perfectly good system that took so long to create just to use another system that the Founding Fathers ruled out so quickly? “In the first presidential election in 1789, the Electoral College had 81 members. As the nation expanded, this number grew. Today, the Electoral College has 538 members, equal to the nation’s total number of senators (100) and representatives (435),” (The Electoral College Explained). The system that they came up with has had little issues throughout past elections, and it maintains a fair way of voting leaving bad personal bias aside.

In order to take a more perceptive look into the electoral college debate, we will need to take a look into the history of the debate as well as the Founding Fathers’ intentions for it. The first thing that we need to take a look at would be the Founding Fathers' intentions as well as how the electoral college changed throughout history. In the article “Electing the People’s President: The Popular Origins of the Electoral College” it is stated that “Our Founding Fathers understood that America is a nation of both ‘we the people’ and a federal system of states” (Villegas 202). What Villegas is saying is that the Founding Fathers' looked at the people’s rights, as stated in the promised bill of rights during the Continental Congress. Most people who argue against the electoral college say that the people’s will and saying of “we the people” in the Constitution are violated, but rather it is a compromise between giving the people a chance at a say of the vote, as well as the federal state of

The electoral college also helps the small states have an opinion that actually is heard in the presidential election. In class, it was discussed that Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota together, though their combined population is less than that of Oklahoma, each of those states has three electoral votes, whereas Oklahoma just has seven votes. Going by electoral votes, a candidate would have a better chance at winning the election if they won over Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota versus Oklahoma. With the electoral college, a candidate could win over all thirty-nine small states and win the entire election. Though the candidate could be supported by less than a quarter of the population,

This voting system promotes all parts of the country are involved in selecting the president. It protects the voices of the minority from being overwhelmed and can give certainty to presidential elections. First, the Electoral College ensures that that all parts of the country are involved in selecting the President. This system has a national focused campaign.

The Electoral College is a longstanding organization in place in the United States of America that was originally established by the Founding Fathers in create equality in presidential elections has become a topic of harsh criticism and controversy over the years. The Electoral College was established by the Founding Fathers of the United States at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in order ensure there was representation of the people while keeping the best interests of the nation in mind (“What is the Electoral College?”). At the time of the writing of the Constitution, there were two main ideas on how to elect a president. The first was that there should be a simple vote of all eligible people and who ever gets the most votes becomes

The Electoral College system assures balanced power between the states, puts the independent parties under control, grants balanced voting, and supports the major political parties. The Electoral College has proven itself to be very sufficient in determining the president and the vice president of the United States. Since this system has been successful since our Founding Fathers created it, there should be no reason as to why we should get rid of the Electoral

Electoral college has been with us since the birth of the constitution, and to this day we are still using this type of system to this day. The Electoral College is a system that the United States uses to elect our upcoming presidents and vice presidents. Each state has electors equal to their senate member and house of representatives, however who ever gets the highest popular vote in the state gets the electoral vote. The issue is the Electoral College do not give votes to the people, but to the states. Which has some unfair consequences.