The Antigone District is made up of three main architectural elements, being, La place du Nombre d’or, Port Juvenal and Hôtel de Région Languedoc Roussillon. (Bofill, 2017) All of which are influenced by classical architecture. The Architect Ricardo Bofill is known to be post-modernist but influenced by history. Elements such as pillars, pediments, arches and so on are merged into the modern architecture, changing them to suit their surroundings yet their core principles are kept. (Enforex, 2017) Many ideologies from the Classical era were carried out in the design of these buildings. Bofill’s designs combined the past with the present to create what is known as one of the most famous Districts. Ricardo Bofill is a Spanish architect. When …show more content…
It was a continuation of La place du Nombre d’or. Ricardo Bofill was commissioned to design it and so the classical influence continued. The classical features are clear throughout the design. It is a semi-circular building designed for apartments. (Bofill, 2017) Like that of The Royal Crescent in Bath which is a clear neo-classical reference. (Yaari, 2008) It is the shape of an amphitheatre, adjoined by a colonnade and includes elements such as pediments, plinths, capitols, friezes and balustrades. (Bofill, …show more content…
(Bofill, 2017) Because of its use as a government building, for administrative business, the building needed to be monumental. The design was inspired by a triumphal arch, first brought about by the Romans, such as the Arch of Constantine. It acts as a gateway into Montpellier and is built from Concrete and glass (Yaari, 2008), changed in such a way as to suit its surroundings yet the core principles of a classical arch are kept allowing the viewer to make the connection between a modern-day hotel and a arch. While it acts primarily as a hotel and place of parliament, it has many underlying poetic aspects such as that of its use, of a city gate and its linear qualities ending off the Antigone district. (Yaari, 2008) The construction of the arch itself is classical. Using glass pillars and pediments to create an arch. Here they have taken two classical architectural elements and combined them by supplementing the arch with pillars and pediments. (Bofill,
There are many fascinating mosaics on the Tower. Some materials used for the design and structure were iron, metal, pink and grey marble coquina stone, friezes, tiles, carved screens, arched entranceway, balconies, and sculpted finals. Some of the themes consist of philosophy, depiction in, the Bible, Nature and humanity. There was also Renaissance -style iron
Two very important historic buildings from the Greek and Roman civilizations, namely the Parthenon and the Pantheon respectively, are worthy of academic exploration. An analysis of their function and style will help to put their design and features into perspective, and create a better appreciation for their emulation in Western civilization. These buildings possess very unique individual characteristic designs, which bears testimony to the societies from which they originate. However, they are also a resourceful database of knowledge in terms of their symbolism, rich heritage of their era and application to the present civilization.
So you 're just wandering through the twisty mediaeval streets of the centro storico (historical center), and as if the cobblestones and ivy weren 't enough, you turn the corner, and out of nowhere is this massive temple. That 's Rome for you. The best preserved ancient structure in the city, the Pantheon as you see it now was built under Hadrian between AD 120-128 circa, although the pediment above the portico is actually 100 years older and signed by Agrippa (which did in fact confuse archaeologists and historians for years). The round
The most significant architectural features of the building are: • It’s battered walls-thinner at the top than at the bottom to give an impression of solidarity and height. •The diamond panned windows incorporated without a style break. •the columns of reeds bunched together with palm leaf
Circulation around the building was discouraged by gardens and on each side of the four facades were extended freestanding walls to help reinforce the impression. The main entrance facade had fluted columns which were taken directly from Palladio’s drawings, found in the Quattro libri. A double-ramped stairway was designed that led to the portico and the basement represented a style of vermiculation. Vermiculation is a form of surface rustication shown as carvings or finishings in building stones.
The building was 200 ft tall, and the façade was excessively ornamented in a beautiful way, and in a mixture of different styles including Gothic, Baroque, Churrigueresque to illustrate the appearance of a Spanish Colonial church. The facade was made of stone, and it did not include usual ornamentation, but sculpted historical figures of remarkable and significant people mostly were
The development of modern day architecture is very fascinating. Even though it has a very significant difference to architecture in the past, it still has many similarities. Many famous buildings we have today still show the same basic designs. For example, the Lincoln Memorial is very similar to the Parthenon.
It contested the professions and the way it was taught. It turned away from conventional architecture and proposed more adaptive architecture that would accommodate the emergent needs of its users through a rebellious style in an age heavily influenced by pop- culture and Dadaism. It redefined architecture and embraced a criteria o perishable yet indefinite, multifunctional space that was applied to new city models. It emphasized a vital support to culturally changing mechanisms of the city and not simply functional organization of space. The radical ideas experimented with spatial, creative, political and consumer freedom that surfaced in the 1960’s.
In this building, Juan de Oviedo really tried to make Sevilla stand out and make the building have a very late renaissance feel to it. The building had very high arches with tuscan columns in the courtyard. It had
The Pantheon and Brunelleschi 's Dome in Florence both share a common idea of the dome in ancient history. They were built and different times, the Pantheon and Brunelleschi 's Dome differ in both design and architecture. This paper is going to analyze the Pantheon in Rome and Brunelleschi 's Dome in terms of their constructional and design techniques, and their historical circumstances of the construction of them both. The Pantheon is one of the remaining and properly maintained buildings of the first century.
The bath houses used arches, domes and vaults to make them both aesthetically beautiful and to work as functional spaces. The Romans also made spectacular private homes for those who could afford them, and designed and built innovative apartment type buildings for those who couldn’t afford a private residence. As with the Greeks, the Temples of Rome were a great architectural achievement. These temples are a significant source of their architectural history and still today are some of the most visible remains from their culture. Unlike the Greeks who believed in having an equal emphasis in their design on all sides of their temples, the Romans put the emphasis on the front of their buildings.
Introduction: The Two Buildings; Parthenon in Athens and Pantheon in Rome are both classical heritage of the former world powers. Both buildings were temple built and dedicated to the gods of Athens and Romans. The excellent strength and the durability of these temples are unimaginable. Going by the length of time that these buildings have been in existence, one cannot but admires the brilliance of the ancient Greek and Roman architects for such excellent edifices that have outlived many generations, and yet remain a symbol of ancient Greek and Roman history.
New designs have been adopted since the onset of architecture, and thus, with the concentration of a history of architecture, new phenomenon and innovations are realized that would help in further explanation and address of other necessities in the same sector. A concentration in the History of architecture and landscape architecture as a course incorporates more than one element of
The Forum of Trajan is a Roman example of axial planning because as you entered through its triumphal arch towards a statue of Trajan in the center, the surrounding structures were at opposite angles and lines, creating a clear sense of order and focus. [12] The complexity of this planning demonstrates the outlook and organization that went into any of the architecture in Rome and Athens. [13] While many citizens at the time did not appreciate (or may have not noticed) this visual architectural connection between Rome and Athens, the members of the elite who traveled, did especially the Roman Emperor Augustus. The cities of Rome and Athens became increasingly similar during the Augustan period and created a hybrid style that was influenced by Augustus. Though the exchange in architectural culture between these two cities was common there were subtle difference.
The style of the building and the purpose it is built give a brief and thoughtful storybook about the culture of the architect as art, generally, and architecture, particularly, is a language itself. Thus, buildings narrate the stories of the people among the history and tell their traditions and habits to the next generation through its design, inscriptions, and details. In this essay, I will discuss how both the style and function of the Greek Parthenon and the Roman Pantheon served as typical examples of their cultures in Athens and ancient Rome. In addition to the similarities and differences between these two cultures through the two buildings. Both the Greek and the Roman architecture inspired the cultures and architects until these days due to the diverse meaning they carry and symbolize in astonishing ways through the different orders, columns, roofs, friezes, and domes.