Animal testing in the United States provides minimal benefits for the amount of pain and distress animals must endure. Animals are given artificially induced conditions, that they would not receive naturally, and experimented on. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated that ninety-four percent of drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in animal tests fail in human trials. The experimentation of animals is not only ineffective, but cruel and inefficient for the United States. With such negative affects alternate ways have been produced to combat the mistreatment of animals.
The Animal Welfare Act was set in place in 1966 to regulate the use and care of animals tested in labs. This act exempts rats, mice, birds and cold-blooded from these regulations and can be treated any means deemed necessary by the scientists. The Humane Society International has stated the "Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies." (Humane Society International). The cosmetic
…show more content…
The polio cases being reported at 350,000 people in the 1988 down to 27 cases in 2016. The director of the University of Texas M.D, Chris Abee, states that "we wouldn't have a vaccine for hepatitis B without chimpanzees," and says that the use of chimps is "our best hope for finding a vaccine for Hepatitis C, a disease that kills thousands of Americans annually." The removal of the pancreas from canines allowed scientist to discover insulin, allowing for an artificial alternative to be produced saving countless lives in America. The experimentation of animals has led to the creation and development of pacemakers, cardiac valve substitutes, and anesthetics, which benefits both animals and
Scientists are Not Doing Enough to Obtain Better Results for Animal Testing FDA reports that the failure rate for animal testing has increased from 86% in 1985 and is now closer to 96% in 2015. Animal testing is not the most reliable way to further human development. Animals lives are put on the line and money is constantly being wasted. If the information from animal testing is not dependable enough to put to use, the entire process will be all for naught. Animal testing dictates animal mortality through inhumane treatment in order to collect data that isn’t always used, squandering money and time.
Every day, thousands of animals are subjected to cruel, inhumane treatment. In the United States, there are many laws in place to prevent the mistreatment of animals, but one of the most harmful ways of abusing animals is not only legal, but considered by many to be completely justified. The process described is that of animal experimentation, the act of performing experiments on an animal that can deliberately cause the animal suffering and even death. Animal testing should be abolished because it is unnecessary, inaccurate, and cruel to animals. Firstly, animal testing is an inaccurate and outdated means of gathering information.
Researchers estimated over 26 million animals were used for scientific tests and commercial testing subject every year in the United States. Over the years animals were used to be tested on medical treatments, products for human uses, health care, and etc. The practice of researching on living animals has started since 500 BC. Opponents of this act say that it is cruel to experiment on animals, there are other methods available to replace the cruel act of experimenting on living animals, and that the human bodies and animal’s bodies are totally two different features and the research often yields irrelevant results. The federal Animal Welfare or AWA passed the animal testing act in 1966 and amended in 1970, 1976, and 1985.
Animal testing has been a subject of controversy for many years and there have been some great discoveries because of it, however, has this practice been done ethically? For a cosmetic company to inject rabbit’s eyes of chemicals, thus causing it pain, is unethical and immoral. This practice negates the theory of Kant’s Practical Imperative, where animals are used for experiments, not only for life and death experiments, but for experiments that indicates whether a product has irritating side effects for humans, for example (Thiroux & Krasemann, 2015). The immorality of this practice is where scientists are subjecting pain and sometimes torture to animals for results to tests. It is immoral, as Kant suggests, to subject sentient beings to pain
Human Experimentation The looming concern of human experimentation was enough to deter some individuals from seeking the medical care that they needed for their well-being. The thought that trusted medical professionals had the power to perform unethical experiments on them while they were in their care was enough to let them live with whatever ailment that they had. By not seeking out the care that they desperately needed in some cases only lead to further problems. Several doctors abused their patients' trust for their own curiosities.
Animals in Research and Testing According to PETA, the animals who are in research and testing “shake and cower in fear whenever someone walks past their cages and their blood pressure spikes drastically. After enduring lives of pain, loneliness and terror, almost all of them will be killed,” (“Animal Testing 101”). Animal-testing is the use of non-human animals in research and development projects, especially for purposes of determining the safety of substances, such as foods, beauty products, and/or drugs. Although animal research plays a crucial role in experiments focused on disease treatments and preventions, it is cruel, inhumane, and should be stopped. This is an act that should be banned and prohibited in all states and countries
Abstract Animal testing the experiments performed on animals that are used to test the effectiveness and safety of a wide range of things, from medication to cosmetics. They are also used to understand how the human body works. Animal testing is one of the major controversial issues, but animal testing has dramatically contributed to science. First, some people think that animal testing should not be used for testing medical techniques and drugs. However, medical research involving animal testing improved the health of human beings.
Do you love animals and hate for them to get hurt? Well if so this is a topic that is very concerning and it is why I believe that it is not okay to do animal testing. There are many reasons why we should not test on animals, and here are a few of them. It cost an enormous amount of money, animals can get injured or killed, and animals are not exactly like us.
Experimenting on animals is not an issue that blossomed recently, it has been going on for years. Most of the new discoveries whether they are related to cosmetics or medicine or even household products have been due to the research on animals. The question should be: “why should animals suffer for something that humans need?” However, is everyone okay with that, or are people objecting the process of experimenting on animals? According to The Guardian, the people’s opposition to this torture has been growing over the years.
Imagine yourself being inside a cage in and lights glaring onto you, with no control of any aspect in your life, not being abled to do anything and be isolated, this is what life is like for an animal being tested on. Ladies and gentlemen, approximately 100,000-200,000 animals have suffered dramatic health issues or have died because of animal testing. Each and everyone has suffered or died because of testing in the cosmetic industry. Cosmetic testing on animals plays a significant part in animal cruelty.
Since animal testing is cruel, inhumane, and alternative testing methods now exist, we should discontinue animal testing once and for all. For these reasons, animals should not be used in research or to test the safety of human products. To begin with, animal testing is cruel, inhumane and it violates animals’ rights. The USDA reported that in 2016, 71,370 animals suffered pain during experiments while being given no anesthesia at all for relief.
This proves how immoral it is to test on animals especially since the law does not require the cosmetics to be tested. The most plausible answer for why the animals are being tested on is a business wants to make money and if the business cosmetic is unsafe and harms one human then no one is going to want to buy another cosmetic from that business. This could leave a business with no
They’re only animals Imagine being used for testing, and being forced to endure many horrific experiences. Luckily, you suddenly wake up and breathe a sigh of relief when you realize it was all just a bad dream. Unfortunately this is a sad reality for the animals being tested on. This nightmare is a demoralizing reality they have to go through in order to “help the human society” while in most cases they are just being used to create unnecessary drugs that won’t significantly help society.
The year was 1997, Joseph and Charles Vacanti two researchers, took stem cells from bovine ears and grew an ear on a mouse’s back in a lab. (procon.org) This discovery led the researchers and more scientist to think about using other cells to graft skin for burn victims, and eventually new possibilities in organ growth. Each year in laboratories across the globe, animals and their parts are used to link necessary treatments and medical medications to the needs of both the human and animal species. It is often uncomfortable for people to think about using animals for testing.
According to the USDA Animal Care Report only in the US there are more than 1000 registered research facilities and laboratories which have rights to conduct experiments on living animals (United States Department of Agriculture). Today the majority of animals used in experiments are purposely bred by scientists in special breeding centers (the purpose-bred animals). Unfortunately, the majority of those animals are killed during the experiments or euthanatized after them (The Human Society of the United States). However, scientists and researchers claim that experiments on living animals are necessary and contribute a lot to developing of many life-saving drugs for humans, such as drugs for treating breast cancer, leukemia, diabetes, heart diseases, strokes and many other (Americans for Medical Progress). Today there are many issues and questions related to animal experimentation: would not it be more appropriate to study human’s disease on humans?