Analysis Of Elie Weisel's Speech 'Perils Of Indifference'

Wiesel pinpoints the indifference of humans as the real enemy, causing further suffering and lost to those already in peril. Wiesel commenced the speech with an interesting attention getter: a story about a young Jewish from a small town that was at the end of war liberated from Nazi rule by American soldiers. This young boy was in fact himself. The first-hand experience of cruelty gave him credibility in discussing the dangers of indifference; he was a victim himself.

Kimel not only uses the repetition of the phrase “No, I don’t want to remember, but how can I forget?” (Kimel, lines 6, 12, and 18) to inform the reader of the horrors of the Holocaust, but also to warn the reader that by forgetting these traumatic events, history will inevitably repeat itself. Oftentimes, when one experiences significant trauma, there is a factor that

Elie Wiesel, a Holocaust survivor and Nobel Laureate, gave a motivational speech on April 12th, 1999, in Washington D.C., as part of the Millennium Lecture series hosted by President Clinton and First Lady Hillary Clinton. Wiesel was invited because of how his experience was similar to the very recent events of Serbian genocide of ethnic Muslims in the region. Attending his speech were both government officials, and the American public. With the traditional use of rhetoric devices, such as ethos, pathos and logos, Wiesel attempted to persuade the audience not to be indifferent to events around them. Wiesel, himself a Holocaust survivor, is validated in his interpretation of indifference “no difference.”

Entry #1 “‘Foward! March.’ My father was crying. It was the first time I saw him cry. I had never thought it was possible” (Weisel 19).

Authors use rhetorical strategies to express themes in their writing. Different rhetorical strategies help convey different themes with varying degrees of effectiveness. One way to determine the effectiveness of an author’s style is to compare their works to another. In order to determine whether Nancy Mairs or James Baldwin is more effective, it is necessary to evaluate the two side by side.

The way the people from Bosnia reacted they did not like it one bit they had taken their human rights and abused Bosnia. The international community had responded and defended the town's civilian population. Wiesel’s warning is that there had been so “many

Followed by several counter arguments to why minority students have false gains when it comes to education. In his essay, Jonathan Kozol most important feature of style discourse would be length and style, because it showed that his paper had thought and quality. It gave specific evidence that helped him ultimately achieve his purpose of writing this essay. Without the length, it would have looked as though the speaker was not fully educated about his research however, Kozol could have narrowed down his argument instead of being all over the

In 1986, world renowned professor and author Ellie Weisel was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize. At the ceremony he had a very inspiring speech to share with the world. In this speech he makes two strong statements toward the end, regarding neutrality and silence. Those are the main topics we will be discussing. Ellie Weisel is a survivor of the Holocaust, and a former prisoner of the death camp Auschwitz as well as Buchenwald.

Wiesel’s use of ethos, pathos, logos, diction, and allusion certainly gives the audience information and emotions he was hoping

Throughout the speech, Lincoln uses repetition to really get the point across to the people just how dedicated he was and how dedicated the people should be. He repeats multiple

Does humanity have too much conflict in the world due to indifference? What will the legacy of the 20th century be, and what had the most impact on it? In the speech “The Perils of Indifference” given by Elie Wiesel, he explains how we as a country overcame many obstacles but have yet to know what the legacy is. Indifference plays a major role in society, and is something we don’t want to overpower our world. Indifference has taught us many lessons, but can we learn from them?

Holocaust survivor and author of the novel, Night, Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” claims that indifference is not only a sin, but is an act of dehumanization. He begins to develop his claim by defining the word indifference, then enlightens the audience about his personal experiences living through the war, and finally asks the audience how they will change as they enter a new millennium. Wiesel’s purpose throughout his speech is to convince his audience not to be indifferent to those who were and are being treated cruelly and unjustly. He creates tones of guardedness , disappointment, abandonment, and hopefulness in order for his audience to see his perspective during the horrific times of the war.

In his discussion of the United States and NATO’s intervention in the territory of Kosovo, where displaced refugees were in desperate need of assistance, Wiesel portrays the decision to engage in this external action in his claim that, “This time, we do respond. This time, we intervene.” In this circumstance, the inclusion of concise syntax maintains the simplicity of his speech and minimizes the amount of information the audience processes. In the delivery of

The speech is convincing as it has all the persuasive elements and the speech is delivered by a person that has high credibility and considered as trustworthy

His country did not appreciate that, and the problem was war and taxes. The result was he was effective at using both repetitions in words and empathy because he ended up convincing his people to go to war right after just coming out of the great depression through his speech. It is obvious that an effective leader uses fear, confusing language, repetition of words and empathy, as seen in the text 1984 and the speech “Four Freedoms”. By employing these four methods leaders gain the trust and respect of the people they are leading.