There is no doubting when it comes to rhetoric that a strong emotional appeal by a credible influential figure is an incredibly effective rhetorical strategy. This is gloriously exemplified in Allison Grimes’ article, "''Rigged' rhetoric wrong, destructive", wherein Mrs. Grimes asserts that Trumps questioning of the legitimacy of the current election cycle is dangerous, however, her usage of emotional appeal and appeal to authority underscores her failure to include logical appeal.
Allison begins her article firmly, by stating "It's time to tell it like it is." (1). Afterwards, she begins with her thesis statement, being that "Donald Trump’s brazen accusation – unsupported by any evidence whatsoever – that the Nov. 8 general election is entirely
…show more content…
In her second paragraph, she asserts that Trump may "tempt his most ardent followers to inappropriately try to suppress the rights of citizens to vote by becoming vigilante poll watchers or, later, resort to post-election violence."(3). This statement is written to inspire fear from readers, down to the basics of word choice. Many words with negative connotations are selected, such as "tempt", "vigilante" "inappropriately" "suppress". This makes the reader concerned about the presence of poll watchers on election day (even though becoming a poll watcher is an entirely legal form of volunteering). She also claims that violence may break out, in spite of her lack of evidence. Grimes also states that Trumps words undermine our democracy when she says "if Mr. Trump refuses to accept the results it would severely undermine one of the basic hallmarks of our democracy"(4). She later states that "Ours is a system that has molded America into a global power, helped us weather wars and depressions, and been an essential building block of economic prosperity, racial justice, and gender equality."(5). The clear implication being here, is that Trumps words will lead war, depressions, loss of economic prosperity, racial injustice, and a rise in gender inequality. Allison masterfully uses the assumptions of the American people to make implications, which if outright stated, would not …show more content…
Allison opens the second half of her article with the statement that "Making it easy to vote and hard to cheat has been one of my highest priorities as Secretary of State."(10). She also claims that "I initiated an Election Integrity Task Force with federal and state law enforcement officials, including U.S. Attorneys, the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, the Kentucky Attorney General, and the Kentucky State Police."(11). Now, to be clear, Allison Grimes is involved in politics, so already has a sort of credibility. These paragraphs serve mainly to further increase her credibility, by showing that not only does she have political experience in general, but she has also worked with important law enforcement groups to root out the specific issue discussed in this article, voter fraud. To the average reader, this should be enough to seal the deal and convince the reader that Mrs. Allison must know what she is speaking about.
Based on the tone of this rhetorical analysis, you may wonder whether or not the author believes Mrs. Grimes article to be a good example of rhetoric, or whether the author believes it to be ineffective. This is where the difficulty comes in, this article is clearly a masterwork of emotional appeal from a credible author, however, the article lacks any substance at all, and almost all of her emotional appeals are based on inaccuracies and the
One women, living in government-assisted housing, was evicted for displaying a pro-Cory Booker sign. Sharpe did not just stop with intimidation and coercion of Newark constituents. Booker’s campaign trailer was burglarized, important documents regarding information on Newark voters were stolen, and phone cords were ripped out of the walls. Booker’s campaign signs were vandalized and he was attacked in the media (Street Fight). An additional characteristic of machine-style politics is exhausting great energy on the mobilization of voters (Judd & Swanstrom, 49).
In response to “Making kids read The Help is not the way to teach them about the civil rights struggle”, writer Jessica Roake informs the audience that she is giving facts about how kids shouldn’t read these books because it’s written by white authors in her article “Not Helpful.” Using several rhetorical strategies, Roake effectively builds her argument. One important rhetorical strategy Roake uses is Logos. She builds her argument by using facts about the Jim Crow laws. She establishes “Jim Crow was a time of systematic oppression, when an entire population was terrorized because of the color of their skin” (Roake, 2).
Sarah Koenig, the host and producer of the popular podcast “Serial” is known for her engaging storytelling style and ability to use rhetorical devices and tools of persuasion to keep listeners interested and invested in the story she is telling. As a journalist and narrative storyteller, Koenig’s goal is to present a well-researched and balanced account of the events she is discussing and to use her skills as a writer and communicator to convey that information in a way that is compelling and engaging to her audience. But what Koenig fails to do is back up her conveyed idea of being a credible authority figure and also fails to provide a large amount of necessary information, while rambling on for unnecessary amounts of time about information that can be easily summed up shorter. Tactics like these show how she receives more listening time, viewership, and money. One technique she employs is the use of rhetorical questions, which allow her to guide the listener's thinking and lead them toward a particular conclusion.
Thank you for your trust in me. Through intense deliberation I have decided. The money will be given to women suffrage, child labor and deforestation. This money allocation will better the world not only for us but the children of the future. I have decided to give $600,000 as a gift.
Jaime Polit 3/22/2016 Rhetoric Rhetoric in Lincolns 2nd inaugural speech & Dickinson poem Rhetoric is a powerful tool in communication that has the ability to ultimately influence an audience towards an action or belief. Although it has a negative reputation as a device used to deceive or confuse by using words in an unfamiliar and odd sequence, the use of ethical rhetoric can serve useful in situations where a certain topic may be deemed too sensitive for direct formal communication or to explain concepts that may conflict with popular belief. Two artifacts that provide an example of this is are Abraham Lincoln’s “Second Inaugural Address” concerned with the Civil War and Emily Dickinson “Success is counted sweetest”. Both employ language in an unorthodox way and use literary devices to enhance their ideas and can be considered rhetoric as they encompass the four resources.
For example, the critics of the environmental movement claim the environmentalists are a threat to personal freedom and if they are put in a position of power, “property rights go down the tube.” Similarly, the environmentalists obliquely associate the critics with the Nazi regime by saying “unrestrained capitalism with land development uber alles.” These attacks are incredibly vicious, but they lack credibility. Neither group makes an argument that is supported by statistics and logical reasoning. Rather, Wilson uses effective propaganda techniques and crafts brash and accusatory statements to show how each group attempts to vilify the other and how it is ultimately
By using this quote to begin the essay Nichols’ declares the quote to be the basis of the whole essay, while setting an irony as the tone. Nichols then
We often assume that the reason behind the low voter turnout in the U.S. is due to institutional challenges (i.e. voter ID laws, registration, costs). Therefore, reformers most often focus on offering and improving various forms of convenience voting to increase turnout. Skeptics such as Graeme Orr argue that “voting whenever, from wherever, is a ‘lifestyle’ option.” Another skeptic, Adam J. Breinsky, argues that convenience voting has “perverse consequences on election reform” and that encouraging political engagement is more valuable than pursuing institutional changes. Although convenience voting offers flexibility and comfort, it is imperative not to overlook what Election Day is supposed to be: a communal event.
Jay Heinrichs beautifully transforms these approaches to rhetoric into a way that make sense today. From examples using celebrities, political powers, humor, and intellectual banter, Heinrichs truly encompasses the real art of persuasion in a way that complies with modern times, therefore proving the books continued use without a
Jeff Bussey had no idea how brutal war really was, and he certainly found out the hard way in Rifles for Watie by Harold Keith. Jeff thinks being a soldier would be fun and adventurous. He learns how cruel and brutal war really is, but he also finds love along the way. Harold Keith mixes fact with his story, and not his story with his fact. Which is a good thing.
When speaking of such matter it is not to be taken lightly or as a joke. This is what the tone is meant for, to help the reader further comprehend the passage beyond the content provided. In this case the future, state, and the way in which America's government
Rhetorical appeals reveal the hidden message the character is trying to convey. The rhetoric also highlights the character’s emotions, feelings and the significance of the text. It allows readers to gain a better understanding of the characters. Arthur Miler, the author of The Crucible, highlights the importance of mass hysteria through rhetorical appeals. John Proctor, the tragic hero is a loyal, honest, and kind-hearted individual.
In the year of 1990 Mary Ewald, a concerned mother, wrote a letter to Iraqi president pleading for the return and release of her son Thomas. Throughout her letter Mary Ewald uses several rhetorical devices. Ewald makes appeals to ethos by stating she and her husbands credentials, she evokes emotion by discussing religion and her son, and she provides logical evidence with detail. Even though the mother is emotional she is able to write with intelligent diction and doesn't reveal a pleading tone until the
However, in parts of his speech Kennedy talks about how certain groups in the nation are working to help the people of America. For example in line 92 Kennedy talks about the Department of Defense. He talks about what they’re doing to figure out why the prices of steel are rising so quickly and what needs to be done to protect the public interest. By using positive and negative words Kennedy is able to make his opinion clear. The audience is able to see Kennedy’s negative opinion on the rising steel prices and his positive opinion on what different organizations are doing to help with the current steel crisis.
She uses facts to support her claim so basically her claim is right because she has all the right evidence to back it up. She puts in her article, "There is an aspect of my Fiction that relates to thus-and-thus"—a speech filled with carefully wrought grammatical phrases, burdened, it suddenly seemed to me, with nominalized forms, past perfect tenses, conditional phrases, forms of standard English that I had learned in school and through books, the forms of English I did not use at home with my mother. (Paragraph 4)" She talks about books she has read and speeches she has read and talks about different English 's that she uses. The English she uses with her mom and the English 's she uses with her writing and everywhere else. Having sources and reading sources to support her main claim helps immensely when it comes down to persuading the