Throughout European history, from the Renaissance to the present, many contributions have been made to societal development which changed European lifestyle drastically. Life leading up to Renaissance was mainly focused on God, however, as time past European’s lifestyle’s began to transform. This transformation from a God centered world into a more humanistic approach to life was and is still presently changing. Events in European history, from the Renaissance to the present, have created major impacts on societal development in terms of politics, economics, and thinking. The Renaissance was a time period, from the fourteenth century through the seventeenth century, that began to take an individual look at the growth of the arts, individualism, …show more content…
Absolutism is the acceptance or belief in a sole power for political matters. Therefore, an absolute monarch governs alone and is not controlled by laws or a constitution. Absolutism had a major impact on Europe’s development through political transformations. The political disorder in Europe created confusion for all of its citizens. People became sick of the lack of structure and called for more organized governments. The decline of the Catholic Church and the Pope’s power allowed powerful rulers to step up and assert their dominance. Taking a look at Europe’s economic standings, not a lot was looking too positive. Europe had experienced a drastic change in the frequencies of trade. Merchants wanted to be able to work in a protected environment so they could earn as much money as possible. Renaissance and Enlightenment ideas on making society the best it could be made people more willing to comply with the absolute rulers who promised improvements in society. Louis XIV, also known as the “Sun King”, was an absolute monarch in Europe during the seventeenth century. Louis XIV was able to weaken the nobility of his people by getting rid of the high and wealthy nobles and replacing them with nobles that came from new aristocratic families. This ensured Louis XIV that he would not have been overpowered. Louis XIV was only one of the many absolute monarchs to have control during the seventeenth century. During Absolutists reign, most rulers created and held a standing army, charged national taxes which tended to fall heavily on the poor, and also encouraged cooperation of the nobility. The rule of an absolute monarch allowed for quick decisions in necessary times, but also created a loss of perspective in the hierarchy of the governments in Europe. Absolutism helped unify European countries and helped pave the way for more organized structures, such as Republics or Democracies, of
The Age of Absolutism The Age of Absolutism was a period of prosperity in Europe during the 16th and 17th centuries. While at this time many countries had absolute rulers, these rulers were able to make a lot of progress in advancing their nations. These rulers are some of the greatest rulers these countries have ever had and helped lead to the prosperity of this era. During this time period, a majority of the rulers were absolute rulers, having absolute power over their country.
It sheds light on the role of representative oversight, monarchical responsibilities, and strategic choices in shaping political systems. The English Parliament exemplifies a gradual and negotiated shift towards constitutional monarchy, marked by power-sharing arrangements and legislative acts that limited the king's power. The willingness to seek consensus and compromise between the monarchy and the Parliament allowed for a controlled transition and preserving certain rights and liberties. Reflecting upon these historical cases, we are reminded of the words from the Bible in Ecclesiastes 3:1 (New International Version), "To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose under the heaven. " The divergent paths taken by the English Parliament and the French Estates General illustrate that different historical contexts and circumstances can lead to varying outcomes in establishing political systems.
The Renaissance reached to an end in the late sixteenth mid seventeenth century. The churches loss a lot of power and grasp of feeling of independence, human expression and investigation led to envy, treason, murder, violence and theft. But than again the Renaissance were the ones that painted the way to a lot of achievements and inventions in a lot of different areas of culture, society, science, religion and modern day life. A lot more advances were proficient during this era that kept on being increased in value, considered and developed in modern day. The Renaissance had a huge influenced on the establishment America was based on and keeps on effecting how American culture and society exist today.
The Renaissance was a period in time where everything started to change after the middle ages. During this historical period humans stared evolving by becoming smarter and inventing useful recourses that have changed the world. The renaissance was a life changing period which brought more joy to the world after conquering the dark ages. The Renaissance changed man’s view on the world by using Art, Science and Literature to make humans brighter and because of the rapid information they were gaining. Art during the Renaissance grew rapidly because of Leonardo Da Vici, and Michelangelo who changed the way people painted and drew by creating strategies which made art more interesting.
The Age of Absolutism is defined as a time period in Europe in which monarchs gained all of the power and wealth over the state for themselves, expanding the idea of single rule. The Enlightenment, on the other hand, is defined as a movement during the 18th century that rejected traditional social, religious, and political ideas, and introduced a desire to construct governments free of tyranny (or single rule). Document 3, a primary source written by King Louis XIV of France in 1660, is describing the idea of monarchy stating,“ The more you grant . . . [to the assembled people], the more it claims . . . The interest of the state must come first” (Document 3).
The price of food and goods increased so much that the farms in Spain were over producing because people were barely buying food at the time. Spain's economy fell into a major decline and was permanently affected after Philip II's reign. 3. Louis XIV had power because he had the power of the church and the government combined. He increased the wealth of his cities while decreasing the wealth of the nobles eventually making his country bankrupt while he was extremely wealthy.
During the 1600s and 1700s a new type of monarch emerged known as an absolute ruler. Some of these rulers were Louis XIV, the Fredericks of Prussia, and Peter the Great. These rulers believed that a monarch had a divine right to rule and should only listen to God. All these rulers had characteristics that defined them as absolutists. Louis XIV was constantly at war during his reign which resulted in a powerful army.
He oversaw the reorganization of the administration and financial domain. Louis also planted a stronger foundation for manufacturing and trading. Many European nations idolized absolutism from the rule of King Louis XIV and such nations tended to imitate the monarchy. Constitutional monarchy in contrast had some of its own breakthroughs in seventeenth and eighteenth century Europe. Constitutionalism obtained traction as a separate counterpart to the uncontrolled absolutism in Europe.
Absolute monarchies had all the power in Europe. Their kingdoms were powerful and accomplished. Although absolute monarchies empowered and enriched their kingdoms, they were still largely detrimental because of King Louis XIV of France, debt, Frederick the Great’s seizure of Silesia, and the city of St. Petersburg. King Louis XIV of France was an absolute monarch.
Eastern and Western European countries had many differences on economics and political structures. Both the East and the West tried to achieve an absolute monarchy, which can be described as a type of government where the monarch has complete rule over everything. Although both had an absolute monarchy at some point, they were structured differently and one much more successful than the other. In Eastern Europe the members of nobility had almost all of the control over the poor peasants who lived in their community.
Two great rulers of the 16th-17th century, Louis XIV and Frederick William, once paved their way into becoming a perfect example of how absolutism could turn out. Either in ruin, or prosperity. Louis XIV was the King of France, in which he praised so much his divine power as a King. On the other hand, there was Frederick William who aided the creation of the militaristic power, Prussia. These two rulers were idolized for their prosperous intellect and unique decisions when it came to governing their region.
Absolute monarchy is rule by one person, usually a King or Queen, who obtains absolute power of authority with no repercussions for what he or she does. Bishop Bossuet held strongly to the argument of absolute monarchy, whereas John Locke opposed on the basis of man's natural rights. Bossuet and Locke have different views on the government’s source of power and their ideas about the rights of the people, but agreed that their chosen theories are in the best interest of the people and held their country's unity in high regard. The first thing we can look at when comparing the two philosophers ideas, is their differences of opinions on the government's source of power.
Absolute monarchs had many positive effects in art, and economy in European countries that made people’s lives better by making certain art popular, and making many investments which led to strong economies. First of all, in economy, rulers took taxes and put them into companies, one example is King Louis XIV who strengthened his economy greatly by investing in companies. He also helped the belief in Mercantilism which meant that they wouldn’t allow wealth to leave the country. Monarchs protected their economy in such ways as placing high tariffs or even, giving money to French companies when in need. The significance of the strengthening of economy led to a strong country that had enough wealth to create a strong army, meaning they could
Absolutism was a period of prosperity during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Absolutism is a form of government, a monarchy, in which a monarch has full governmental control. This is different from that of a limited monarch whose power is kept in check by a constitution or other government officials. Absolute monarchs gain their power in one of two ways: being born into a royal family and being in line for the throne or seizing control. Absolutism meant prosperity because monarchs were considered gods (or God 's power on earth), they changed countries for the better, and could be liked by the people for not doing everything in a harsh way.
This can help to increase the land of country. It is also important that the ruler has to have a superior knowledge about politics and economy. So that they will have less possibility of getting into trouble with other countries and they can prevent the country from having a lot of debt.