The novel A Clockwork Orange, by Anthony Burgess, follows the teenage narrator Alex through his years as a wild, violent, and destructive teen to the point in time where he finally decides to grow up. Alex and his group of friends enjoy stealing, bullying, beating, raping, and lying. However, the fun ends when one night Alex takes his enjoyment of beating too far when an old lady decides to fight back. Alex ends up getting arrested and while he is in prison, the old lady dies. He is sentenced to forteen years in prison. Two years into Alex’s sentence, he gets into a fight with another inmate and he kills the inmate. The next day, the prison hands over Alex to a doctor who promises to have Alex released as a changed man in less than two …show more content…
The prison chaplain explains this question as, “Does God want goodness or the choice of goodness?” (Burgess 106). The books portrays a dark time where young people rule the streets preying on the old and weak. These people are the ones who will carry us into the next generation. Prisons are ineffective, and in their own way actually increase violence, “Cram criminals together and see what happens. You get concentrated criminality, crime in the midst of punishment” (Burgess 102). This is where the new program which trains people to become physically ill at the sight and thought of violence enters the story. The use of IV medication while being strapped down and forced to watch videos of violent acts is the method used to take away the choice of wrongful acts. However, even if one violent person is ‘cured’, there will always be more violence in the world. The program Alex goes through unintentionally renders him incapable of defending himself from violence that faces him. The doctors do not see this aspect as a problem, but simply assure Alex that, “Violence is a very horrible thing. That’s what you’re learning now. Your body is learning it” (Burgess 121). In a culture that is riddled with violence, is it wrong to take an offender and turn him or her into a victim? It is morally wrong to take away a person’s right to make …show more content…
Burgess gives a glimpse into a potential societal outcome that would be disastrous and full of violence. A society where choice is not an option but rather, “Never again will you have the desire to commit acts of violence or to offend in any way whatsoever against the State’s peace” (Burgess 106). What makes society great is diversity of personalities, people, and lifestyles. While society would be better off without all types of violence, it does not improve the quality of living, it simply takes away the right to make negative impact decisions. People do not have improved morals or ideals. They are only capable of right and moral acts because they are violently ill. I was able to personally connect with this aspect of the message of A Clockwork Orange. It is a constant debate in politics and the media on what rights people should have. For example, a person’s right to marriage equality or a woman’s right to choose abortion over pregnancy. These are not as serious as entirely taking away a human’s right to make bad decisions. However, the fact that our society is strongly focused on what should be simply and minor choices because of freedom shows how distracted we are by control. Burgess’s novel shows an amplified version of our society and its selectively distorted views on freedom. The hope for
A simple act of violence can genuinely affect an individual's state of mind. Through violence, individuals feel empowered and are tempted to prolong their violent nature. This results in one heinous act, following with worse violence. In Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Ishmael Beah’s A Long Way Gone: Memoirs of A Boy Soldier, both authors effectively highlight a theme, that violence will ultimately lead to more violence.
The film “Murder by Number” also includes medical issues, including brain damage, as contributing to the violence of many serial killers. Some criminologists and psychiatrists believe that serial killers kill because of issues with their families. These issues include failure to properly bond with
He states “violence has always been around, usually concentrated among the poor. ”(pg23) From his experience of growing up in the ghetto to seeing it now, he argues, popular culture has strongly influenced and supported an ethic of violence. He describes how the different kinds of violence evolved from his childhood to him being an adult. He explains that when he was a kid,when a problem emerged, him and his friends would solve it using their fists and sometimes weapons such as small knives.
Violence is unacceptable We are living in a turbulent world. On average, there are about 150,000 deaths every day because of diseases, old age, traffic accidents, and especially violence. The data from FBI indicates that in 2013, an estimated 1,163,146 violent crimes occurred in America, and somebody commits a hate crime every hour ("Violent Crime”). The fact that more and more gruesome murders happen shows that we are living in fear of violence, and this violence is unacceptable. FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting Program states that, “violent crime is composed of four offenses: murder and non-negligent manslaughter, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault,” ("Violent Crime”).
That is “it fails to achieve the objective it promises, and in the process contributes to the state of disarray” (Wills, 7). Wills explains that the issue with in the prison system with redemptive violence is that it eliminates responses which are non-violent, and may even be the more optimal solutions. The main issue Wills sees with the consequences of redemptive violence is that “redemptive violence provides perpetrators with a perfect excuse to avoid the road of inner examination and acceptance of responsibility” (Wills, 10). In turn, those perpetrators will insist any accountability outside of themselves which leads to more unwanted actions and behaviors. Wills presents a similar argument to Gilgun in how redemptive violence is not a save all concept, and it comes with an array of
How does an ordinary group of people turn into bloodless killers? The author of Ordinary Men, Christopher Browning offers the most captivating argument towards how it is possible for ordinary men to commit extraordinary atrocities. This paper will analyze the different viewpoints of what caused ordinary men to commit murder. To better understand this issue one must understand the sides of argument.
Therefore, many youths fall victim of becoming aggressive and engaging in criminal behavior just by residing in those troubled neighborhoods. He goes on to assert that the strive for “respect”—or being treated “right”—induces violence and criminal behavior in the society. And according to Anderson, this is true because some alienated members of the society, who believe that they have no positive or dignified position in the mainstream are still convinced that they deserved some sort of personal ‘respect’. So, those people show and display “nerve”, devising and exercising rules in violation of mainstream norms so that they can gain respect. In effect, when one abides by the ‘code’ and manifests ‘nerve’—so that people don’t mess with him/her—the end result, if successful is the
Inmates are constantly violated by cellmates and prison guards, both physically and sexually. Violence is often associated with prison gangs and interpersonal conflict. Prison guards are bribable and all kinds of contrabands including weapon, drug, liquor, tobacco and cell phone can be found in inmates’ hands. Crime within the fence is rampant, only counting those with violent act, 5.8 million reports were made in 2014. If the prison is really what it claims to be, shouldn’t prisoners be serving their time with regret and learning to be obedient?
A serial killer’s violent rage may reflect the abuse and neglect endured in childhood. Their intense hatred cultivated in the early stages of childhood now will be directed at their unsuspecting victims. In The Killers Among Us, Stephen Egger claims that many case studies of mass and serial murderers discovered a reoccurring background of ”neglect and early years spent in extreme social and psychological deprivation” (Egger 29). Continually, Egger states that the most common aspect of the serial killer’s histories was the physical abuse and violent punishments inflicted on them as a child. As a result, their subconscious stores these traumatic memories and emotions, which later has a powerful result on their behaviors and emotional life
Prisons were created to keep out the bad and abnormal that were disturbing society, but over time urbanization and capitalism advanced prisons into working factories. Prisons are a way for people to reflect on the decisions that they have made. In Chapter 5, Redemption and Hope, Reamer reflects of the different ways prisoner’s coup with being released on parole. Surprisingly, there are many inmates that get released and commit another crime and are sent right back in because they violate their probation. However, there are the lucky ones who make it out and stay out.
The works of Dittmann and Golding imply that people will be more violent in a survival situations that are difficult to exit because they provide the person with an ideology to justify their actions so that they will not be held accountable. In the article “What makes good people do bad things?” the author states that situations can foster evil by “Providing people with an ideology to justify beliefs for actions”(Dittmann) and by making “exiting the situation difficult”(Dittmann). Golding examines these points in his novel through his character Jack, one of the older boys who fills a
While this movie may not be for everybody it does contain an interesting and controversial commentary on society. It seems that the primary message argued in A Clockwork Orange is that through abuse Alex has been considered cured, people must not be used as scientific experiments even if the experiment is for the greater good of society. The needs of the many do not outweigh the rights of one and by breaking this moral code by the elected officials drastically changes the way the society favors their government and its practices. Social engineering is not the answer to eliminate a disruptive youth culture and maintaining order within society. Violent impulses, sexual urges, the enjoyment of music, participating in social camaraderie are all essential parts of the human experience and eliminating any part of that experience would eliminate what it means to be a
The theory views the offender as either a patient or a victim or both. According to this theory a person who has committed an offense is not morally responsible for the offense he or she has committed because the offense might be the product of an illness in which treatment is required; this type of person is regarded as a patient. When the offense is the product of a dysfunctional social environment the person is regarded as the victim. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the offenders, instead of punishing the offenders this approach focuses on repairing and treating the dysfunctional areas that the offenders are experiencing by means of behavioral therapy and other therapeutic programmes.
Alex has no regard whatsoever for the rights of others and the rights of society; the behaviour mentioned is common amongst psychopaths. Alex, spent his youth stealing, torturing,
Esbensin, Peterson, Taylor and Freng (2010) implies that “ young people who have committed serious violent offenses have the highest level of impulsive and risk-seeking tendencies.” Moreover, extreme violent criminal activity being performed in front of youth increases the risk of them performing acts of extreme violence themselves. Because youth see those acts as acceptable so committng those violent activities make youths to become ruthless. Smith and Green (2007) assert that violent activities becoming ruthless and the perpetrators even more ruthless.