Social And Environmental Factors In Blood On The River

In "Blood on the River," the colonists' abuse of the commoners is an interesting representation of the difficult circumstances faced by individuals looking for a fresh life in the fresh World. The book is filled with examples of terrible mistreatment. For instance, the commoners in Jamestown were immediately forced to hard work and harsh conditions when they first arrived. In the book, it is stated that "The settlers had to build a fort and houses for themselves, clear land for crops, fetch water, and gather firewood" (Page 47). The commoners were forced to work nonstop without any rest or support, which put a tremendous physical and mental stress on them.

The common agreement to what happened at Jamestown is the near Native American tribe, the Powhatans, were cruel, vial, and refused to help the struggling English who would almost die out because of malnourishment. Though the Powhatans refused to feed the malnourished English people, even with the English leader John Smith begging for help, the Indians felt threatened by the English because of their presence, weapons, and John Smiths threats. Therefore, the Powhatans cut off ties with the English for the fear of starting violence (Doc G). The “starving time” had nothing to do with Powhatans lack of help and originated in the lack of skill the English people had and the violent treatment to the Powhatans. The English were left with little experience

The alliances in the war portrayed a huge ordeal because in 100 years the Indians would no longer be part of this region. “The more fortunate captives were given to Mohegan and Narragansett sachems who had assisted the Puritans in their war against the Pequots.” These allies assisted to help win the war over the Pequots. John Underhill and John Mason were leaders during this war, they were one of many leaders who help assist to lead victory against the Pequots. First of all, the English should’ve established a peace treaty in order to trade, but instead they failed to do so, and led to several English captains such as John Stone and other Englishmen to be murdered.

The Powhatans were jnot fond of the colonists for good reason. For example in DOC. D some of the men use “harsh” methods to get the indians to give them food. The “harsh” methods happened to include the beheading of two indias. In DOC.E you can see just how many conflicts the two groups had.

The English use violence to get what they wanted which cause distrust for the Powhatan’s Chiefdom. The colonists brought many diseases with them when they arrived to the new land. This would cause many of them to die and many more would die due to the attacks from the natives. For example, they learn to grow crops or force the natives to grow it for them.

The usage of the land was important for the Creek people, and within this importance was political, commercial, and combative power. The text illustrates this in chapter four by saying, “They also had equally strong practical bonds to the land formed by their subsistence and commercial needs and certain political imperatives” (Ethridge, 54). The Creek Indians lived in river valleys, and therefore forged their towns and villages to make the most out of the natural resources that were available in that kind of landscape. An image of this kind of landscape may be seen by reading the text, “The land rises from the river with sublime magnificence…present to view a delightful varied landscape…” (Ethridge, 55).

(Bradford 13) “...being well armed with clubs, targets, bows, and arrows, they charged the English... ”(Smith 2) These are perfect examples of the attacks faced by the colonists. Later on, they both would receive help from the natives, Pocahontas helped Jamestown and Squanto helped Plymouth Plantation. “In two or three months’ time half of their company died, especially in January and February, being the depth of winter…”

The Native Americans might would have been violent because they didn’t know their intentions. It was important because they were able to negotiate, without the English taking advantage of the Native Americans. When the Pokanoket tribe and the Plymouth colony settlers formed the treaty, it

For two years, peacefully, the colony and natives traded. For the colonists to now have access to food, was a new beginning for them. There was a lot less death (even though there was still the presence of diseases), a lot more people were surviving. With instruction from Smith the colony was getting along, not as well as it could have been, but surviving just enough. Smith is the one that that creates a bond with Powhatan that was easy to see in Narratives of early Virginia, so when Smith was injured in an accident and had to return to England in 1609, the two groups started with conflict again.

The narrative offers an account which can be used to describe the particularly puritan society based on the ideals of Christianity and the European culture. It offers a female perspective of the Native Americans who showed no respect to the other religious groups. The narrator makes serious observation about her captors noting the cultural differences as well as expectations from one another in the society. However, prejudice is evident throughout the text which makes the narratives unreliable in their details besides being written after the event had already happened which means that the narrator had was free to alter the events to create an account that favored her. Nonetheless, the narrative remains factually and historically useful in providing the insights into the tactics used by the Native Americans

In Blood on the River, colonists move to a settlement they call Jamestown. Yet, they had trouble getting started because the settlers did not cooperate well with one another. When people don't work well together causing events, it's called social factors. Claim So, Jamestown struggled to thrive because of the social factors, and not generally the environmental factors.

You are Powhatan people. What happens to one of us happens to all of us- that is why we took care of you after the fire. ” Finally, the reader can piece it all together. There is a cause-and-effect relationship. Since Captain Smith became part of the Powhatan Empire, he affected all of the settlers.

&&“Love and Hate in Jamestown” is a book that tells the story of the U.S.’s first colony in the eyes of the American legend John Smith and through the accounts of the other settlers. The book starts with a small history lesson and eventually ties it in with John Smith, a soldier who eventually becomes a leader among the men in Jamestown. As we read, there is more detail to whom Smith is; where he came from, a small farm in London; what he went through, he became a soldier fighting in foreign lands with the Turks and getting caught; his family, the battles with his father that kept Smith home as an archer. Moreover, Smiths’ story rolls over to how he was able to go to Virginia; the colony in Virginia started out as a business investment until it was royal property in the 1620’s. Now, while going to

This was the compare and contrast about Jamestown and

The Natives believed that the Europeans are “edgy, rapacious, and remotely maladroit.” Sure enough, the settlers in Jamestown kenned little about farming and found the environment baffling. It was conspicuous that the colonists needed the avail of the Natives. Despite their inexperience the English dominated the Indians. From “the beginning the Virginia Company indited that the relationship would ineluctably become bellicose: for you Cannot Carry Your Selves so towards them but they will Grow Discontented with Your habitation.”